From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#30024: [PATCH] core-updates: librsvg: Disable more failing tests Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 15:13:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87k1wsfng7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h8rwbzft.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYYBj-0004qL-9O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:14:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYYBf-0005wy-Se for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:14:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYYBf-0005wo-Ng for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:14:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYYBf-0007D3-IQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2018 09:14:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h8rwbzft.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 08 Jan 2018 02:08:06 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 30024-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > On the core-updates branch, in librsvg, some tests fail on i686 and > armhf. I've attached a proposed patch, but I haven't yet been able to > test it because I no longer use binary substitutes on my systems and I'm > currently having some difficulties[*] building the base packages. > > If someone else would like to test this and push it to core-updates, I'd > be grateful. It would be sufficient to test on i686, I think. Tested on i686 and pushed, thank you! > [*] GNU tar's handling of sparse files is broken on btrfs filesystems > and thus fails its test suite on my system, and the test suite of > guile-2.2.3 hung up (no output or CPU usage for 30 minutes with a > defunct guile process) on my x86_64 GuixSD system. Many file system related tests fail on Btrfs. :-/ As for the Guile failure, it=E2=80=99s weird. Could you gather more info i= f it happens again? Ludo=E2=80=99.