From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: bug#31294: Failed building dependencies for guix.
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 23:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87k1jltn7e.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <BLUPR16MB05006CCADC9B1E67C28BCF65928C0@BLUPR16MB0500.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
	<87vaca578z.fsf@gnu.org>
	<BLUPR16MB05002D49B4A0E83B5F5FF4DD92820@BLUPR16MB0500.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
	<87po2hyozt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<BLUPR16MB0500BA35BBAD09BFB6A735A192820@BLUPR16MB0500.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
	<87po2gtn82.fsf@gnu.org> <878t93sdly.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39269)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gfB50-000869-C7
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 17:03:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gfB4w-0008OV-Jv
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 17:03:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37642)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gfB4w-0008OL-CZ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 17:03:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gfB4w-0001jM-8F
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 17:03:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.31294.B31294.15465529426595@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <878t93sdly.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 28144@debbugs.gnu.org, "31294@debbugs.gnu.org" <31294@debbugs.gnu.org>


Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:
>
>> It confirms that the bad code creates a <gexp> structure with the empty
>> list as its =E2=80=98modules=E2=80=99 field instead of '((guix build uti=
ls)).
>>
>> That=E2=80=99s clearly a Guile bug.
>
> This miscompilation issue involves =E2=80=9Csyntax parameters=E2=80=9D (b=
ecause
> =E2=80=98with-imported-modules=E2=80=99 uses a syntax parameter), and it =
very likely has
> to do with the thread-safety issue I describe here:
> <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D27476#74>.

I just got this on my Fedora workstation in the office, where I use Guix
from a git checkout.  I worked around this by moving =E2=80=9Cguix/profiles=
.go=E2=80=9D
out of the way.

(Some people seem to be getting this with just =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D =
now.)

--
Ricardo