From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#36100: Jami leaks memory
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:30:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87k1dq7xiz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <16b135f47a5.c48c9e1512716.4579175065592128011@zoho.com>
 <878su7xamv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <16b4cb481c8.bec2698023794.900017298306389181@zoho.com>
 <87zhmmsfi1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <16b4dc2633c.11b1e783627802.2566747870323318895@zoho.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50415)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hbKCP-0002NF-J5
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:31:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hbKCN-0000nL-PH
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:31:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49119)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hbKCM-0000mV-Hs
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:31:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hbKCM-00052V-AQ
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 03:31:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36100.B36100.156041102419315@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <16b4dc2633c.11b1e783627802.2566747870323318895@zoho.com>
 (sirgazil@zoho.com's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:15:13 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com>
Cc: 36100 <36100@debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi sirgazil,

sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:

>  > > I thought that maybe this bug report could be used as a reminder to =
update the package definition of Jami in Guix to a version that fixes the l=
eak?=20
>  >=20=20
>  > I think it=E2=80=99s better if the bug report is actionable.=20
>
>
> Sorry, Ludo, I don't understand what actionable means in this context.

What I mean is that the bug should highlight something we, Guix people,
can do about it.  If it were reporting a purely upstream issue, there=E2=80=
=99s
little we can do on our side, apart from upgrading or applying fixes
available upstream.

I hope that makes sense!

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.