From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#22883: Authenticating a Git checkout Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:05:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87k16go2oq.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87io14sqoa.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87h9ep8gxk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160426001359.GA23088@jasmine> <874majg0z8.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn3iz1xc.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87wpket748.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmkwm8ed.fsf@gnu.org> <87png9o8i2.fsf@elephly.net> <87fth4bj6y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilEcJ-0001Jf-S8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:07:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilEcI-0003ys-NK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:07:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilEcI-0003xi-IO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:07:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87fth4bj6y.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 22883@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > The caching implemented in 787766ed1e7f0806a98e696830542da528f957bb > makes things acceptable: the first =E2=80=9Cmake authenticate=E2=80=9D ru= n takes a bit > more than two minutes to check all the commits starting from =E2=80=98v1.= 0.1=E2=80=99, > but subsequent runs take a few seconds. This sounds good. I wonder how we would integrate this into =E2=80=9Cguix pull=E2=80=9D. For authentication to work at all the user would have to have *all* past keys. (I=E2=80=99m missing at least one of the keys, because only current = keys are contained in the keyring on Savannah.) > I have plans to make things faster (independently of the cache) by doing > OpenPGP signature verification entirely in Scheme instead of spawning > =E2=80=98gpgv=E2=80=99 every time. Again, we=E2=80=99ll have to get a pr= ototype before we can > tell whether it actually is faster. More things implemented in Scheme =E2=80=93 I love it! :) -- Ricardo