From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#39505: Adding filesystem utilities based on file-systems
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:32:08 -0500
Message-ID: <87k14hxanr.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20200208003122.GA31711@jasmine.lan>
 <87blpu2av8.fsf@apteryx.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <20200220183726.GA6891@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42193)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j4sVO-0005YL-Vy
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:33:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j4sVN-0006TJ-42
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:33:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39960)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j4sVN-0006TC-13
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:33:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j4sVK-00045x-VF
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:33:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39505.B39505.158223073715647@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200220183726.GA6891@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of
 "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:37:26 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 39505@debbugs.gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:31:07PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> What is the use case?  Just having btrfs utilities to manage Btrfs file
>> systems, or is there some problems to avoid?  I know that for NFS you
>> must add nfs-utils so that the util-linux provided 'mount' is able to
>> mount NFS shares.
>
> It's just to manage the filesystems. For example, the equivalent of `df
> -h` requires btrfs-progs.

OK; so just as a convenience.

>> If the later is the use case, perhaps we could try to hard reference to
>> each file system utility in util-linux, instead of having it dispatch
>> some tool supposed to be in the PATH?  I'm not sure how difficult that
>> would be, and it'd for sure increase the size of util-linux, but perhaps
>> the pros outweighs the cons.
>
> Is there some integration between util-linux and btrfs-progs?

No, at least mounting Btrfs doesn't require a mount.btrfs helper like
NFS does.

Maxim