From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#39926: Regression introduced by Shepherd 0.7.0 ('make check-system TESTS=btrfs-root-os' fails) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:07:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87k13j4r3e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wo7yswwy.fsf@gmail.com> <87blpa7m3j.fsf@gnu.org> <87a74skcb1.fsf@gmail.com> <87d09ojt6z.fsf@gnu.org> <878skbetjh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jE2aJ-0004Rt-UW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:08:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jE2aI-0004Aj-RO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:08:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jE2aI-00046p-Jy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:08:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jE2aI-0004tC-Cm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:08:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878skbetjh.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sat, 07 Mar 2020 22:36:50 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 39926@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Ludovic! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi again! > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > >> The broken udev rule is =E2=80=9864-btrfs.rules=E2=80=99 in eudev: >> >> # reconsider pending devices in case when multidevice volume awaits >> ENV{ID_BTRFS_READY}=3D=3D"1", RUN+=3D"${exec_prefix}/bin/udevadm trigger= -s block -p ID_BTRFS_READY=3D0" >> >> =E2=80=A6 where =E2=80=9C${exec_prefix}=E2=80=9D is expanded from =E2=80= =9C@bindir@=E2=80=9D, a classical >> issue that we should report upstream. :-) >> >> In the meantime, the following patch should solve the problem. I=E2=80= =99m >> running the test now, and if it passes and you=E2=80=99re fine with it, = I=E2=80=99ll >> commit it. > > I pushed the patch as 24a4a635fd76a91463c75cfe615929ec482cc2f6. > > It doesn=E2=80=99t solve the =E2=80=9Cbtrfs-root-os=E2=80=9D bug though. = :-/ > > I noticed that it=E2=80=99s the installation.drv that fails, not the basi= c.drv, > which is why we see =E2=80=9Cgnu=E2=80=9D as the host name. The weird th= ing is that it > fails after =E2=80=98reboot=E2=80=99, so I=E2=80=99m not sure what that m= eans. To be continued=E2=80=A6 > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. I've reported this problem to upstream here: https://github.com/gentoo/eudev/issues/182. Thanks for working around it. Maxim