unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>, 43143@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#43143: Building iwd on armhf triggers kernel panic
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 01:04:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0xc22gu.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875z8wop8q.fsf@ponder>

Hi Vagrant,

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:

> On 2020-08-31, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2020-08-31, Mark H. Weaver wrote:
>>> Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:
>>>> I've been getting kernel panics when i try to build iwd, a dependency of
>>>> network-manager.
>>>
>>> Which kernel package variant(s) and version(s) have you seen panic when
>>> building iwd?  What hardware?
>>
>> The hardware is veryron-speedy (a.k.a. asus chromebook c201p), with a
>> rockchip rk3288 CPU and 4GB of ram; I might be able to test on
>> additional hardware at some point (I've got a pretty old guix install on
>> a novena, but don't recall if it was in good working order last time it
>> booted).

That message went on to say the following, although you omitted it here:

>> linux-libre-arm-generic@5.4 5.4.57, and presumably older versions as
>> well, as I had commits in my local guix from mid June disabling iwd on
>> network-manager.

> Ok, managed to build iwd just fine on a novena imx6 platform, running
> armhf on "linux-libre" 5.4.25 (haven't yet finished upgrading the
> system).
>
> So it appears to potentially be hardware-specific? The imx6 vs. rk3288
> are pretty different platforms;

Based on what you wrote, it sounds like it could either be a
hardware-specific problem, or else a kernel-configuration-specific
problem, since you used radically different kernel configurations in
these two cases.

If I understand correctly, 'linux-libre-arm-generic@5.4' is the variant
that panicked on an rk3288, whereas the 'linux-libre@5.4' variant with
our hand-crafted default configuration worked on an imx6.

I don't know whether it's possible to use precisely the same kernel
configuration on these two systems.  Anyway, it would be helpful to
retry the 'iwd' build on these two devices with kernel versions and
configurations that are identical except for a minimal set of required
differences.  That would help us narrow down the set of possible causes
for this kernel panic.

What do you think?

      Thanks,
        Mark




  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-02  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31 23:26 bug#43143: Building iwd on armhf triggers kernel panic Vagrant Cascadian
2020-09-01  1:13 ` Mark H Weaver
2020-09-01  5:40   ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-09-02  3:02     ` Vagrant Cascadian
2020-09-02  5:04       ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2020-09-21 20:32         ` Vagrant Cascadian
2022-09-29  0:26           ` Maxim Cournoyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k0xc22gu.fsf@netris.org \
    --to=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=43143@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=vagrant@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).