From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kDSUAQgqWl/IGwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:28:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id qB8sOQcqWl8sXAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:28:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A427D9406B8 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMcw-0007SC-Cm for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:28:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMbP-0005IO-6q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:27:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMbO-00086P-JA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMbO-0006uE-0l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32548: Cuirass: Performance monitoring Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32548 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 32548-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32548.159974440226520 (code B ref 32548); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 32548) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 13:26:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMb4-0006tg-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:26:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMb2-0006tT-Ll for 32548@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:26:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMaw-00083x-41; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:26:34 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:9d9d:97cc:d92a:8ac0] (port=56598 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGMav-0006kp-26; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:26:33 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87pny3783p.fsf@gnu.org> <87d02zge5e.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2lmlox2.fsf@cbaines.net> <874koarop0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:26:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874koarop0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:11:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87k0x14vax.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 32548@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.49 X-TUID: xUGTTI3VO4rW Hello, > Agreed. We regularly push commits that are weeks or months old > (sometimes years), so there might be too many outliers when looking at > the commit time. Yes, so I used checkout time instead of commit time with af12a80599346968fb9f52edb33b48dd26852788. I also turned Evaluation 'in_progress' field into 'status' field. This way it's much easier to create some metrics on evaluations. It also allows to distinguish between 'aborted' and 'failed' evaluations. Thanks, Mathieu