From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id mBBYMeIn5GV17gAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 08:33:55 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id mBBYMeIn5GV17gAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 08:33:54 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=Sw8+h4la; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709451234; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=iNOYjHNRja1mnki8PnrHvG38iA8J6rGe5iWlg46ktxc=; b=agnj2ouUFAXOnAXfMPekobk38JHkbORJvrO69gFytkzSLu75Fnk8YGBxBJEsJ11tP8DzQJ DbCnufKfx+VcsTKbP/T8Jlwj4O+/kmgD1nhsJ2tipGNr2VWJQjf25XK5OroXqt5UB7mPx4 kG0xljMvJ5B6QkawGL0aeBO6HefEJpsXjqNK5ttXb5sWhK0nKZ+XxOfjlr2StMjpoexw7P JRGOcYLkec75+cdB7CglUztP1hndj0Z5zLExr1Uf27ObCt41jn2v98pYNt4S9VHCFlrIMV lKoSq92Iz79qIlmOijn5Pf6IX2pHqe5aglay6rlCgzAf9otYZh7n2e8Mc1+Xdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=Sw8+h4la; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709451234; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=p9RfVLHHv4ddUGrvZPALUnGdOWMaQh4RxyiFtQYNWALA3dYVdXrIeLwKqRkggF72Sh/n6z s4P8QbhWrFejFPVpoo7qoA+5ba89rwbBX3wt45j9q22MNIbdqtUjkLwLfOMONxVZmpsttn Pt8kmbvebQfhu4ucDFc21/EzlifsGl/PWQvoPK71GS2znDW3xfEKCt2vB7CQf49k2Qcrlk nFRx4t/Tw0oJgyCCjIS2PKQ2JQmn1ZyC/Ns0LHf4p4CjLTNR7s/ckor8VttsfZqUrn5p7S GQr3wUFxEjj+sOTfDvd/jIuojQTnTXtnJj6Ojh8d6g2HM8rbU0s7t21WzqE+uw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725C761562 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 08:33:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rggLn-0007xh-DM; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:33:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rggLl-0007w3-Qo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:33:33 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rggLl-0000Cy-IG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:33:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rggMD-0004zu-Vo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69515: grub-efi-bootloader doesn't make multiple boot entries with efibootmgr if multiple targets are specified Resent-From: Oleg Pykhalov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 07:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69515 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nathan Dehnel Cc: 69515@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69515.170945118819134 (code B ref 69515); Sun, 03 Mar 2024 07:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 69515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 07:33:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rggLL-0004yY-Qa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:33:08 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:39041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rggLG-0004xz-Ur for 69515@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:33:06 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-513056fe2b0so1163602e87.0 for <69515@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 23:32:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709451088; x=1710055888; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iNOYjHNRja1mnki8PnrHvG38iA8J6rGe5iWlg46ktxc=; b=Sw8+h4lamSAsTdaHeRB7uKwPrsgmoUyAQPoHt7CoQ5MSkG+JjQ/FsRx3gkp0d7Gf7r BQUuF0o1RAztPCON2pFUT4F1NAxBlZc2xR6Wt8k1qnpGWKfnpb1M0ScNRg3D6QpSwkmg AXZL3+y1iAli/iD1bsz2mpi2zyHccMHTuVGzD+AlvZd/A+S6J/YfhUyIsZvGE9CSafKK 4Uq/pxr26/4JGj1AuhiL+uxhPqyPQF7QcGAPMiInwIH3c7dwk3LN6UvIM9Aypo3kNaAl +RAGLZC3j++H177P9cHVYBbxJpwmBxzPRBPIHirDixoqFeUAcr7lLYBYQYBqV7Qsh12p OlpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709451088; x=1710055888; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iNOYjHNRja1mnki8PnrHvG38iA8J6rGe5iWlg46ktxc=; b=qYLCDyIG6MJvqpjD/QePzEk9wcA8s6gXwwVtwtQjKsXXsz0DpCBWdq+TviEkb+1g8E QTk46dyOZzC2uDFl1bR2/jJO3+ENQtSlZUMiKVswNeeUc0oJ3h/23sRwTLzrKxj5WLFO B60PuprX0mvkS5QsDHfyoPVfnU8krC/bPJHuIK9f3nROT5lD/rHpbPQz8SuVmF5J0o4h QjqK7OX3ac4NoqPF+omR3/5cTWZNhMN28yaGL1vs6MHtK7lsK5MlmT4ORcBdWJVbfPFt NOEXsRG1w7T2jXJFJcvVE2MWjhGkprjiWDMn3506ptacBIN/BRv8bZd9SeCH7J7yEQpz rFJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywtogo65xtuPLoLp97pr4sjKujz68sX51bkNRoDAF6ORey3e1Gu ZIFLrzjRZnl3MIeW7RS1qT+usyc1WMPKSvdT1CpZ3mWEGJ3SUG+L X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFf4RBPbVAoR3Wqn42Auag2o/0RXi/4lqt/jxwoRh9zNQf0rPUxdh1Eo6RZtQdSGbBkrs6+cw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:104b:b0:2d3:364c:2620 with SMTP id x11-20020a05651c104b00b002d3364c2620mr3888657ljm.1.1709451087491; Sat, 02 Mar 2024 23:31:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.201.161.72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x13-20020a2e9c8d000000b002d24f3a55basm1195157lji.110.2024.03.02.23.31.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 02 Mar 2024 23:31:27 -0800 (PST) From: Oleg Pykhalov In-Reply-To: (Nathan Dehnel's message of "Sat, 2 Mar 2024 17:01:27 -0600") References: Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 10:31:26 +0300 Message-ID: <87jzmjojox.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.27 X-Spam-Score: -7.27 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 725C761562 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: XwGOvX5d9m7s --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi, Nathan Dehnel writes: > (bootloader > (bootloader-configuration > (bootloader grub-efi-bootloader) > (targets '("/boot/efi1" "/boot/efi2")) > > This creates multiple boot partitions, but doesn't register all of > them with the BIOS/create multiple boot entries It appears that the reason for the issue is that the EFI file is identical on both targets. Could this behavior actually be considered a bug? Consider the scenario of a multi-disk system; have you attempted to remove one of the disks and observe the boot process to determine if the duplicated EFI file is causing unexpected behavior? Regards, Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJIBAEBCgAyFiEEcjhxI46s62NFSFhXFn+OpQAa+pwFAmXkJ04UHGdvLndpZ3Vz dEBnbWFpbC5jb20ACgkQFn+OpQAa+pyh7Q//Wb3dGLcNQRVWDHzcSM44O0IyFS3H 0TdJXJMFVM91WJTjtpCKGHcBT726IC5M8wSmu4IPcYAJ04zyU6knEIJpXgbfxh6M 5k53dj5WFE8Br+5+Kch6c4lRq7XQ7xCOb9AVyxKxufX3mAAfTTmi2KbRxB59muQu G4AWmt719GC6sa/80RwBpaRBJzDdv57SQfTH+OaJBPfsJETQHlQ79RW7h+mrAF4J SOapiOkm2+eVGRh89F7VfLXWEzknYR2AG32JC8Giv9V+cMOVnq4bWZglzj36Uy0d cAC2lrMTB1VL0OC4L3vFydyLWoz+lLBp/zflFadudfD7DAo2YRJdtoBhgMT0ldYv 5sImCZ2hPV5OtCHiS+PMgsK+zW5AuVnVG1lRA0HL0URANmu8jdaMofCw+8q/kb+x xhctCfQqqBGX6OLUD0yvRtAamvKCT88gOksBWSAjDhGWqPM8FHODSSQaz3deUOeS JVvRNBDGSpgvSW/xsvEBUCfoHrL7xr5BCYopdisCwvwxfyQ5W+Ukz31ndXpGHBkr jvZwexJrW55Vnc6hJaFHVLRojq+148zwTUv2hJdp/KLvO0wnRmsuIYwhggZ/C+Lf gu3wN6ImwuJi0c5MPJfLBeuOW8t6VeAgeBGAzOCSXBE/nbOfD9P3Z8Ju4TQrr/ZE +fQdqud6jEzIaio= =SA4H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--