unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: "Clément Lassieur" <clement@lassieur.org>
Cc: 33370@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33370: guix publish: at least one user will have to build a given substitute
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:09:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in10km16.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftw4wnc7.fsf@lassieur.org> ("Clément Lassieur"'s message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:48:40 +0100")

Hello,

Clément Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org> skribis:

> I've noticed that narinfo baking is triggered by user requests when the
> '--cache' option of 'guix publish' is used.  It means that the first
> user who will want it will get the 404 response and will have to build
> it manually.  (See guix/scripts/publish.scm, make-request-handler.)

Note that the first request (404) returns with an expiry of 5mn instead
of the default (much longer) expiry for “normal” 404s.

We discussed this behavior at length back then and that seemed to me
like a reasonable behavior for a service with many users: the first one
gets 404 (or has to wait for 5 more minutes), but when there are enough
users, it doesn’t matter much.

For a single-user setup, I recommend not using ‘--cache’.

> Would it be possible to trigger the baking right after the build is
> done?  So that every user can be sure that they will get the substitute
> once they know that Cuirass has built it.
>
> If 'guix publish' has no way to get the notification that a build is
> done, maybe Cuirass could trigger the baking?  (But that would be
> hackish in my opinion.)

I had that in mind: adding a build completion hook on Cuirass, which
could trigger baking (I don’t think it’s particularly hackish: Cuirass
is the only place that can send a notification.)  Basically we’d run:

  cuirass --build-completion-hook=/some/program …

and that program could do a GET on the right narinfo URL(s).

This would be useful in reducing latency; the downside is that we’d bake
lots of things, even possibly things that nobody ever needs.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-14 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-13 23:48 bug#33370: guix publish: at least one user will have to build a given substitute Clément Lassieur
2018-11-14 10:09 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2018-11-14 10:18   ` Clément Lassieur
2018-11-14 14:49     ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-11-14 15:34       ` bug#33370: Cuirass: Trigger 'guix publish' baking Clément Lassieur
2020-11-30 22:15 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87in10km16.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=33370@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=clement@lassieur.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).