From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: bug#36942: Reconfigure broke GRUB Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:43:59 -0400 Message-ID: <87imr8n4lc.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> References: <20190806023517.uvf7ukp3qprsfvpv@cf0> <87tvauxvxo.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87o912duoo.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <20190807191628.qm3mmpmkobumhsx4@cf0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvRul-0003Wx-4z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:48:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvRuk-00030p-8C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:48:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvRuk-00030Y-4C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvRuk-0001qk-17 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:48:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190807191628.qm3mmpmkobumhsx4@cf0> (ison@airmail.cc's message of "Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:16:28 -0600") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: ison Cc: 36942@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi ison, ison writes: > I'm sorry to report that it actually didn't fix the problem. I'll continue to investigate; perhaps I'll be able to reproduce if I copy your exact partition scheme in the virtual machine. I'm sorry that you had to go through that whole 'guix init' spiel again. > Also I don't know why it didn't occur to me to mention this detail > before, but the reason I previously thought the message mentioned in > bug#36878 was important is because it's actually the very last thing I > see on the command line after reconfiguring. The line I'm talking > about is of course: shepherd: Evaluating user expression (let* > ((services (map primitive-load (?))) # ?) ?) > > I'm pretty sure even if that message is normal, it's not normal for it > to be the last line you see. Perhaps the reconfigure is dying at that > point, or some point shortly after, without outputting any other > errors. Do you see a "bootloader successfully installed on ..." message earlier in the output? 5c8c8c455 changed the order that things are done in so that services are upgraded after the bootloader is installed. Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl1LKgAACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2Vpb8xAAmwcmlShMxXDIOrJQVIl+EayDAF//57GaZNaKNNJL1FZqvjYiUPaxEMUU kVdyyzNF9Ai92Juhya0NhFOGXpEdcA+7LFthowny77WLcSczMtikJcsF3ZtzFysA tB7dgyAeMCFfZ4gC5XgNlFjASsJwjk0qq8GGptXoRm1fp6N86OgZnkp1C0XSIi2l gqS8DzrkCYpa5rKFowwwztBLMfVxWjaJmZjfuNcVmWSRnr5Lt/9gr7WUmVCI+hx4 bzKXaiFfHwHNux8DbtP25dJlRTIFUazgtfEnLyAhhRbc49XoNB51uduxWpn8z+jG t+oZ6xz2aiSvo0eJOQIJcJZaA9Ebs0+EYT1qoZGdYXhpuFtM8t0TcJC7a0j4AWrf 6eqh3icvn01NEvyVYePJP1EGY+k8IwuFamG0vNmo25hqvFvO4UCZexZgBxLCDA/E XakNPJgSn+3gxsuuTATh8y6DPgnWYZz3qKGr7MBd8FEXdWu+n4u1FcNx7gEHf43z PF6R0+8/V/tWBnzDfymkaMHbUEasEdgzgfQ5QXV8Ckl2yoMyhyRMNSZ3fzwnRtYC i3KE706clIGLzL//8n21NMRLyO00GEBe71qU1Mp5ADR9nvWpXP1O2EOqXoI5/jt3 Xol0VnThW9PGbIIE/CKmmaPuFAnYj9YJgQ/ti40V3juq+b6flbA= =Nw0q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--