From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YHuoMB9MzF4kPAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:52:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 8DudLB9MzF5kCQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:52:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D46B9400AF for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 22:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLx7-0004tc-Se for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:52:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwy-0004tK-4z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:52:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwx-0006H7-SH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:52:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwx-0003ew-Ra for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:52:03 -0400 Subject: bug#32324: Failing Tests Resent-From: Marius Bakke Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 22:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 32324 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 32324-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 32324@debbugs.gnu.org, marius@gnu.org, mwb71@case.edu Received: via spool by 32324-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D32324.159044710514036 (code D ref 32324); Mon, 25 May 2020 22:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 32324-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2020 22:51:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwf-0003eK-BB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:51:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwe-0003e8-7e for 32324-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:51:44 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwY-0006Eu-Ub for 32324-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:51:38 -0400 Received: from ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no ([84.202.68.75]:39900 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jdLwY-0004wl-7i for 32324-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 18:51:38 -0400 From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <7f41efe533a0.74909ba52bc8b7f@guile.gnu.org> References: <7f41efe533a0.74909ba52bc8b7f@guile.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 00:51:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87imgj632f.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: 1AJ1+e1cLmls --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Thovthe via web writes: > Should this remain open? Probably not, as there has not been movement in almost two years and Fedora 28 is pretty old by now. I think newer versions should work. Thanks for the bug triage! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7MS/gACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpduggAl+NOHDJicia7RRh6zrF8bhK1OGEEyyo9pUfqef4RvWkt82jzs1o0+E2j IsK0YRw4c1bW8how6nAAeqWlVO78s1BVz22niRBaMtYC8opT78jWZNlwz7AukB/L g5LrzmblYx1LVt399OO4RE0eNZXMdSZ5yIgXpxR5MwTi5uvyfK5OAwXD/sFNcxV9 rGRB5WurgjQx/IwKWfeR0IVeUUkhLoTAZgpeTrGWbdS+blTRpSvoxall6z+YMGMV rZsTuHP85Gb4c7rrOyKi4dNVLv7jgAq6CNQuZm9qWzRSx2w8KF+obPKD3wMpjPCj kWzcCNOQDKUSTIRCXf5YAT+geGy5Uw== =VlUT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--