From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GMuqEjZokF9NFgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:56:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id cPBtDjZokF+ELwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:56:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BA29403C9 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40084 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHPQ-00069N-QA for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:56:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHP9-00067n-SB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:56:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHP8-0000fI-I3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:56:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHP8-000751-Gy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44112 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Guillaume Le Vaillant , zimoun Received: via spool by 44112-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44112.160329934927195 (code B ref 44112); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 44112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 16:55:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHOv-00074Z-DJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:55:49 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:50887) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVHOt-00074L-LT for 44112@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:55:48 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADEDB60005; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:55:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87r1przfwo.fsf@yamatai> References: <86o8kw80bl.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnzjzr77.fsf@yamatai> <87y2jzzm3d.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87r1przfwo.fsf@yamatai> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87imb334dv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44112@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.61 X-TUID: QVGSb6vj5Lcn --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but > currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could > be fixed [2]. We'll see... > > [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/ > [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583 Thank you so much for asking! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl+QaAwSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/31wH/3LA595p9lpR88NvU9D6a9sC3Xkp2FWq n8QP+ZV/OLJ5CYR5yveGhgegs73S65IYpTxC1ZezowGkZzfbU6mHnBO2FJV6Wl8E R8WJaAzxhxRjNy1TL46tViBY5PQ6QniyIw3lyAwI38VAoch9z4ykEKRIh7ex5/qK /iKcv0rSNNxCqLDFgob//t+aPY4E4NaYpumtCOpx4bUQp0jECyVuikU1QfkqmQBm VQ/45m/s5B26G+Xs6pYYQ/zTub3/mxcEszi3+ttnCfCsu0Q7r1vDQe9Ge1hE/riH LIZM1JRag3iyRrgR7mh5g251EiWgyLG6usCKmCjWcNkj8On2yjYiwVI= =MonO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--