From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#21620: tests/mpz/reuse intermittently fails on armhf-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:53:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9kgg1sw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mvvxuxoo.fsf@gnu.org> <868u7gb1s5.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <87d1wsm0jo.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4ffsa3y.fsf@netris.org> <87egh7b0p0.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3l6onje.fsf@netris.org> <87a8ru5sic.fsf@gnu.org> <20151008190754.GA6984@debian> <87k2qwtpk4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzn4h-000758-Nu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:54:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzn4c-0000D0-NJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:54:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzn4c-0000Cu-K9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:54:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzn4c-0002Zg-Ad for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:54:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k2qwtpk4.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:27:07 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: 21620@debbugs.gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:32:43PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> Do you think it=E2=80=99s a likely problem? Andreas, could you try aga= in on >>> your Novena with 2 cores turned off? >> >> I have trouble believing the explanation of overheating. The gmp test >> suite is carried out sequentially (they are not yet using the parallel >> test harness of the autotools). So one could only imagine that the build >> itself was faulty, but should then the test not fail consistently afterw= ards? >> If I understood correctly, you used one build and ran the same test >> over and over again. On the other hand, since the machine also serves as= a >> build machine, it is possible that some other package was built at the s= ame >> time as the tests were carried out, which may have contributed to heatin= g. > > Yes. > > I think the only way to test the hypothesis is to turn off 2 processors > and run that test in a loop again, and/or to do that on a different > ARMv7 platform altogether. Did you have a chance to do that? What can we conclude? TIA! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.