From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Sassmannshausen Subject: bug#27003: [PATCH 0/3] Generalized wrap phase for perl, python. Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:45:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87h90322vn.fsf@pompo.co> References: <20170520093742.2115-1-alex@pompo.co> <87pof35lc6.fsf@fastmail.com> <873a2319.AEEALFrChFQAAAAAAAAAAAPFd4YAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKyA9@mailjet.com> Reply-To: alex@pompo.co Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFKzo-0004in-EA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:46:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFKzj-0002c4-Jk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:46:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFKzi-0002bu-UG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:46:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFKzi-0000JB-Hu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:46:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <873a2319.AEEALFrChFQAAAAAAAAAAAPFd4YAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKyA9@mailjet.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27003@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Arun, Thank you for testing my patches. Arun Isaac writes: > Building on my system is taking a long time. I'll need some more time to > properly test these patches. But, if I understand correctly, these > patches still wrap binaries with paths of native-inputs. That problem > remains to be solved. Yes, I certainly did nothing to resolve that particular issue, so indeed it remains to be solved. I cannot currently make guarantees on when I'll be able to wrap my head around the entire problem, so if you come to conclusions for next steps on the basis of your testing, we should go with those. Else I will revisit this issue when I have time (which might be a while). Best wishes, Alex