From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#27429: Stack clash (CVE-2017-1000366 etc) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:49:41 -0400 Message-ID: <87h8yyn696.fsf@netris.org> References: <20170619222550.GA29289@jasmine.lan> <20170620004920.GB31586@jasmine.lan> <20170620071857.GA2768@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <87shiumj05.fsf@netris.org> <20170621084134.GA2870@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170621095045.GB2870@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170621235227.GA4510@jasmine.lan> <20170622000336.GB4510@jasmine.lan> <87zid0iksk.fsf@netris.org> <87mv8rqcuu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQbim-0003HX-3C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:51:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQbig-0003wN-DW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:51:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQbig-0003wH-93 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:51:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87mv8rqcuu.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:58:49 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27429@debbugs.gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > As discussed yesterday on IRC, here=E2=80=99s a patch that applies the gl= ibc > patches for CVE-2017-1000366 in =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > > That=E2=80=99s a rebuild-the-world change but we still have work to do in > =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 anyway, notably regarding the Perl dot-in-= @INC issue. > > OK for you? Sounds good to me, but I've already merged 'master' into 'core-updates' with this as a graft, so what's remains is to ungraft it there. Also note that when I merged it, I forgot to add "glibc-memchr-overflow-i686.patch" to the older variants of 'glibc'. Unfortunately, this was a case where git merge automatically did the wrong thing, without any conflict. I was going to fix this soon by eliminating the redundant lists of patches, but now I won't have to. Thanks, Mark