From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:01:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87h8q06jcg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58305)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1erNqb-0003Ww-Lq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:02:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1erNqV-00072B-Sl
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:02:09 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58636)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1erNqV-000724-Pd
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:02:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1erNqT-00078J-Q3
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:02:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30569.D30569.151990926927354.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed,
	28 Feb 2018 22:46:28 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: 30569-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>>> What should we do?  Status quo?  Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates=
=E2=80=99 call?
>>> Let=E2=80=99s have a poll!  ;-)
>>
>> The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for =
free,
>> so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider t=
his
>> behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!)
>
> I agree.  I don=E2=80=99t see a reason to allow for the same package to a=
ppear
> more than once in the manifest.

Alright, fixed in 435603a1d6106b535cf143d17cb030b2d0795b54, thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.