From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#31284: [PATCH 0/1] guix: Add git-fetch/impure. Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: <87h8nteebx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180427081217.28576-1-cmmarusich@gmail.com> <87efixykrk.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCwY2-0000ex-1m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:20:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCwXy-00075e-TK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:20:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCwXy-00075K-OF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fCwXy-0005YD-HJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 20:20:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87efixykrk.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:39:43 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 31284@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Chris, > > I don't see your patch anywhere in . > Can you resend it? > > I'm curious how you arrange for a build process launched by guix-daemon > to have access to your 'ssh-agent'. Although I've dropped my objection > to this idea in principle, I have yet to review the technical details of > how this actually works. It might be that the details will raise > further alarm bells in my head :) The patch can be found here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D31285 I accidentally sent the cover letter to bug-guix@gnu.org instead of guix-patches@gnu.org, which is why this bogus bug report (31284) was opened. I've closed this bug report in favor of the "guix-patches" one. Sorry for the confusion! =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlrmYPIACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp2bsg//SqldnhbIrrGQOX2e8ErZy4avIbf3qNaI1NjpRs1MrssLz/ezlCeAx4gi dSeu4bBTCEy2uBTx25Y8hNGIik6TidTtBrkb5N3EHGmtsZfH/f6nG0ElBnatG9Fg 8Re5+6tYD5UHWVpCcaP/dg77G9vWkuFx2a5A56GuLTvV42XzIxu99IIzaL5IOz/j diK1bYhf9/SHZYpP8TjB64yfC00KiwAaIsuA5kHk3seYahCds/WKpR+YL+DnFpNC nEO/qVFdmNjCHMe9gLo7r5ivBN0aYoeePr4r8KbspdiaBpIYycSG/2YoKj9QJ40l zCkc5aAYe+FMX/ZbredeTfGSVJ/O6gDzynJblLLO5FZkRguknuQwmbRSdB5hevFV VBG6kTVoQnBDBA+lK1hIx4+maUVy7Yh/BZikijkn9UAnGD+fMZ+Pq1n6fDU2oIdr gAiryuFM8+J0rYeR6iFLpoKdX3q0yzGxabfQyk+B7gT3vnQtjlpYCi7gwNY+RAUE im1zGCGcmMikYXze8i/SMMBNiUKlVol6yOrrkIrsPC3xVZzgxklP085bFz28Rqwg oftJCaCwC9hBxvpVOIf7dKyLPrgPo4E4KTX7A/ipl2ehIjng2gxrWIw6+ZVpBmpU Y6VKe07PRiYcK7oJMK6GhDBU+iaTKJh0ugXxm9UIdWcw8poElBA= =tPEE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--