From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>, 32845@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32845: guix.info: Missing manual
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:03:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8i91jaq.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2hfrmcf.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:28:32 +0200")
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
[...]
>> I wonder what should be done with guix.info: should we keep it as a
>> mirror, or should it redirect to gnu.org, or the opposite?
>
> I really don’t know. I didn’t plan for guix.info to become popular, but
> it certainly is convenient right now as we can change DNS records at a
> whim.
>
> Currently, the manual shown on guix.info is fairly close to the latest
> in git. This means it contains documentation about channels, which
> cannot be found in the latest release that matches the manual on
> gnu.org.
Yes, it’s convenient.
>> My initial plan was to use guix.gnu.org as the primary domain but we’re
>> stuck with the “Let’s Encrypt vs. multiple entries in DNS A records”
>> issue. At the same time, guix.info works just fine.
>
> I thought the bigger issue was running a DNS server, which is something
> I’ve never done and wouldn’t like to take on myself.
I’ve never done it either :-) but our Knot service makes it looks easy.
> The problem with naive Let’s Encrypt updates is that automatic
> challenges might fail when the “wrong” server is returned by the DNS
> server. “certbot” can be used with manual DNS validation, which
> requires us to deploy a DNS TXT record. This can be automated with
> certbot hooks (scripts that have access to the token that should be
> published via environment variables) or through JSON mode, which returns
> an object with the token that can be processed through other means.
I didn’t know about all this! Looks like our Certbot service doesn’t
support it though?
> I think the Let’s Encrypt updates shouldn’t be a blocker.
To me it was the main blocker.
Let’s see if we can bring more knowledgeable people on board…
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-28 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-26 10:33 bug#32845: guix.info: Missing manual Pierre Neidhardt
2018-09-26 18:01 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-09-26 19:44 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2018-09-26 20:10 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-09-27 13:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-09-27 15:28 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-09-27 17:37 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2018-09-28 20:08 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-09-28 20:03 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2018-09-28 20:38 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-09-28 20:39 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2018-09-29 16:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-01-25 18:00 ` sirgazil via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-01-28 10:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8i91jaq.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=32845@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mail@ambrevar.xyz \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).