From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#22533: Python bytecode reproducibility
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:39:21 +0100
Message-ID: <87h8djmb52.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160202051544.GA11744@jasmine> <87bmqfu44s.fsf@fastmail.com>
	<87606c23bq.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAE4v=phoeRvKHG96Y1-_A2TRAK_wNPUyBgMFgq6+Cd9enFScUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<874llw101c.fsf@elephly.net> <871sgz1wg0.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAE4v=pjfpPfuihBbFVrB_Tx5py3hp+3aaFDJ6E++tHR2YPwXYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87sgxvtl19.fsf@elephly.net> <87va20wos0.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42774)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gqn9u-0005z1-Dy
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:56:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gqmuI-00073I-RU
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:40:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60554)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gqmuI-000739-N2
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:40:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gqmuI-0002I0-IQ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:40:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22533.B22533.15493199658746@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87va20wos0.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sun,
	03 Feb 2019 22:22:23 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 22533@debbugs.gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Now that we=E2=80=99re using Python 3.7 and this version supports hash-b=
ased pyc
>> files, is this still an issue?  Do we need to do anything to enable
>> hash-based pyc compilation?
>>
>> See:
>>   https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.7.html#pep-552-hash-based-pyc-fil=
es
>>   https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0552/
>
> It looks like this is no longer a problem.  I built borg just now and
> the pyc files are reproducible.

Yay! \o/

Ludo'.