From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#33639: ISO installer image is broken on i686 Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 23:43:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8b0i7ol.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190413134609.kwmx53hyawgtaaza@pelzflorian.localdomain> <3867672606037906126@scdbackup.webframe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFn2j-0007xS-4U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:52:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFmvu-0000s9-H5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:45:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hFmvu-0000rz-Bi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:45:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3867672606037906126@scdbackup.webframe.org> (Thomas Schmitt's message of "Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:20:57 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Thomas Schmitt Cc: bug-xorriso@gnu.org, 33639@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Thomas, "Thomas Schmitt" skribis: > Florian Pelz wrote: >> Yes, it seems fixed, I can confirm. > > Way back in december, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>...> Based on this and on a suggestion Ricardo made on IRC, I passed >>...> -padding 10m and that solved the problem. \o/ > > Please do not forget to remove this -padding command. Done in f6e3f0f9b1287eca120517a0161e3d0b1ed6ed44. > If all files and directories have the same names and the same content, > then xorriso runs with the same arguments and the same SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH > value are supposed to create byte-identical result ISOs. I=E2=80=99ve tried setting it but that doesn=E2=80=99t make any difference. How did you visualize differences, Florian? Diffoscope fails for me here (missing tools and scalability issue.) > In december, i wrote: >>...> > Creation Time: 1970010119010649 > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>...> For reproducibility purposes we set timestamps and related things >>...> to the Epoch. > > Is this independent of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH ? Yes. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.