From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#33924: OpenJPEG security issues Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:41:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8angxto.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20181230174150.GA21025@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJLCk-0004Pd-AE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:57:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJKyD-0003c0-BT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:42:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJKyA-0003Y7-3X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:42:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hJKy9-0000ib-Tm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:42:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181230174150.GA21025@jasmine.lan> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari , 33924-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: > There are several open security bugs in our package of OpenJPEG 2.3.0: > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=openjpeg > > `guix refresh -l openjpeg` reports that several thousand packages would > need to be rebuilt if we changed OpenJPEG, so we will need to fix these > bugs by cherry-picking the upstream bugfix patches in a grafted > replacement package. > > If anyone is interested in doing the work and needs advice, please ask > for help :) > > These are the CVE identifiers: > > CVE-2017-17479 > CVE-2018-5727 > CVE-2018-5785 > CVE-2018-6616 > CVE-2018-7648 > CVE-2018-14423 > CVE-2018-16375 > CVE-2018-16376 > CVE-2018-17480 > CVE-2018-18088 I believe commit 0e2b0b05accdea7c3f016f8483d0ec04021114d3 fixed these. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlzAkcMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoXHgf+LpcKxDsqQMdO+1yqYblKOnnMkoGqtz1/WoP5HlZZV1Mp0Yy+/moncejn uRtzhkNP4+5dKptjuP5090Ug8NOURcf/c8HrK+ytMxG0K7EqMauVELnuhbOvJLst vKzxxee/Tzx86yh/IuHIg3bSkmshxNuHgQeg1heHRbNd1BgwvXsv6q6YLA+cW0v+ rO0FNE9fMJ8hyjvytLT1rujMUXnI9uGVWIR2BMfnxy0wcnxOOyUgTvLhtu8sTrdt YKA53dcotiIM55AKw2iIcAswOyfpIomaNNDK0It5I1277g4hjrKnwh4CUSNHPyhX De1PZ/h6VSdNRsMppqnqeBz6IktW+Q== =UZTJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--