From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#29686: gnu: aspell: Do not ignore GuixOS system profile. Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 23:31:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87h83thlbk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k193r09v.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k18rahx1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOr4w-0005UE-1H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:32:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOr4u-0005PO-1m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:32:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOr4s-0005Oo-4U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iOr4s-0005he-0U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:32:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k18rahx1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sat, 26 Oct 2019 13:02:34 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 29686@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > I just noticed that Nix has a different, possibly better approach to > this in the attached patch. > > What do you think? I think that honoring an =E2=80=98ASPELL_DICT_DIR=E2=80=99 variable is more= generic than browsing a set of profiles (which ones?), especially with support for search paths as available in Guix. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.