Liliana Marie Prikler skribis: > @Guillaume: From what I can gather from the build error, it appears as > though the calling convention changed to require an additional > parameter. I've tracked down the relevant commit [1] and bug [2]. > > Now obviously doing such a thing violates SemVer, so if rewriting 0ad > with this and other changes in mind is not an option, I think having a > hidden package for 0ad might be the lesser evil. > > Cheers > > [1] > https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/commit/a3c605929b16303e8a52ae9d99d5fe6769e8bf09 > [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1681268 Thanks for the pointers. I added a phase to fix the compatibility issue with mozjs-78.15, and pushed as fea60a2fff443b9c172ed28bd37361e34e064f13.