From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id IHQDNjSsgWUQhAAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:44:04 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id EDuzLjSsgWU0lgAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:44:04 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=AWsaQ80d; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1702997044; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=NF8FPIfSVi02+SLpcETjP3Xo9oPD0Zcj+7NykSbMI4U=; b=Z7jK2CxPvgEFFMUmfsKRinhJZgD2yDTJ40Cxh3jhS1N/K+jraeY9JywSYTwlwjYjo3hkbb GEsRABU8TRawgsnQWBBKvtJdEl0qbm+f90J3pDPEtpcHuPp2H3VgS71hmZKAyKSE/pvKZn zHXJsFCuEXVTFiqTTFr4JooOlo+V4PoZCudawZvCGHP50nIWGAR/pHn9ci48Hd8ckPi/dK AGiHVc5+lqpxk4JaGl7Ct47Q9jcs62Ro6JPDkJL9NYmsntg7mFwyMQiJTzPmVtJkMGXy3r U8FJF62YhmwrlTPKVaW/cwb//WEjIP/fBpkcqayR8/RfzgRTxi3izR4xWrIzDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=AWsaQ80d; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702997044; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=pzjk+OgF8WGddtEUFCDF9QqITM6orAU5E8Q6nhQFKRnk4xOSijbvmxq9gLZHEutDCXYiVa u2HE3DJRsHgBKKeQuQvmmHY3HubhDDzAs8R3LLfjeNqWOsL2SJmNjMiXBNGuiq+e73x+l4 JXaUNmzv6SRxvr0E2hd/QxNARwA1yS24ErmYJLqQxTjk/t07Qc9tgbhC388wUEXw5+tMKV OGS68JEoKAgveBRdWHasDr6aV/KG/R7zgJytwJLDo6LDQmA4wUUujK0sXFklJt9ENT8n7d nin8keBFsWRDYO1SFK71SlKmVneqNFEc/yfhyuIUVpvw80zwSkw9m2yjgY91/w== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E92433345 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:44:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFbKD-000496-0g; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:44:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFbKB-00048h-Tj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:43:59 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFbKB-00044j-LY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:43:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFbKE-0002Fg-88 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65788: poor information when updating using =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cguix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?time-machine=E2=80=9D?= Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65788 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 65788@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 65788-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65788.17029969838556 (code B ref 65788); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 65788) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2023 14:43:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFbJE-0002D8-6l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:43:03 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]:40298) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rFbJ9-0002CW-4f for 65788@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:42:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40c2655da63so11651845e9.1 for <65788@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 06:42:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702996967; x=1703601767; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NF8FPIfSVi02+SLpcETjP3Xo9oPD0Zcj+7NykSbMI4U=; b=AWsaQ80dJqmK1RgpsjVJLpeU986w5cWKplTR29TKOz+JSbyjIRRJKIMVSw6pdS8fSi VtzVZqJ9pYiUF5sLX8G+hBDvUiY0NySqmNibRmTYthSZ8T0AdeKF4IQw9NNRuz+U1ZP9 IiGf0Vr4bmYgxbb8UHIYwHxl2f0H1I7rTsCZ4Z48MLw6JMiZs76v64cgOFRMOqaNLsi3 pPhQSz8sFpuBUW7zw9NDo6YA0zIXIiVMnAQn81oUM/IRMKV2pxC1brf9Kiwc/VGP8Azp qeMGhbnJzW3rZsQTBY/MP+hkpBogNPEnlvw5QKkBpw3W75XLvvLfzbsJOnOUMHdyHI2I fzUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702996967; x=1703601767; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NF8FPIfSVi02+SLpcETjP3Xo9oPD0Zcj+7NykSbMI4U=; b=jEqfA/eBL0tOhT3nyWzoChSYHrz/nQKH20pDT4Qjj9TJMB5QbegoNaRWoV0XZroNGu q5BqaEs9LqCn7H/v5IY52llQC4kr3OdR7MNKQLF65TWC/YhWosXjXLBFz6fjhG9kmD5Y turlkRgsHoGMN9izyS1didblh3X9iUGCVBd+9LgGTbPG2g/RRUEhy8VviaDPxd83uZ8h 1rk95QLbmM/nlSq1A59cbepee57udIV2vjVKkG+tFPpY36S1App+jWmx6uQjaQrwWJhX v7DJhMdT5tleVB2oeLae+rsKEsc8c8BRnLWHcYsoLqncq7X8R4qiauqsB7dM/khO9p3m VmcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywl2tCM7zLFIeLvDDy/z6KApri7Nn9BBIcWdVpGbkUda3mP1beb uoiH+C0ufAfD7c2whfP1m+E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFdgZ0NHA2ns3i923UMG3z9foog3OwYEohuvxoQIJMJ1tmq6EEeU4dyQN0bk6IXbaKrmm8Bcw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b23:b0:40c:6e2a:35ec with SMTP id m35-20020a05600c3b2300b0040c6e2a35ecmr8444020wms.0.1702996966585; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 06:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o21-20020a05600c4fd500b0040c5cf930e6sm3102238wmq.19.2023.12.19.06.42.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Dec 2023 06:42:46 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier In-Reply-To: <875y2q96hz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pm2vme7x.fsf@gmail.com> <875y2q96hz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:36:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6ke45to.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.14 X-Spam-Score: -2.14 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8E92433345 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: 5PqAEYDQOL7e Hi Ludo, On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 16:16, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Why not move this =E2=80=99validate-guix-channel=E2=80=99 to internals. = Somehow, it is >> in guix/scripts/ because it captures =E2=80=99ref=E2=80=99. However, th= is capture is >> redundant and is normally managed by =E2=80=99channel-list=E2=80=99. Th= erefore, I would >> be tempted to have this validation for the reachable commit close to the >> =E2=80=9CUpdating=E2=80=9D message. > > Yes, that=E2=80=99s a good idea. > > As I started looking into it, I realized we could reuse the existing > #:validate-pull mechanism of =E2=80=98latest-channel-instances=E2=80=99 f= or the purposes > of this commit check in =E2=80=98time-machine=E2=80=99. [...] > Here=E2=80=99s my proposal to do that: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66793 This improvement does not address this issue with %oldest-possible-commit, right? In addition, we also need to consider =E2=80=99inferior-for-channels=E2=80= =99 which calls =E2=80=99cached-channel-instance=E2=80=99 =E2=80=93 currently with th= e default (const #t) for #:validate-channels. For an instance of bug with inferiors, please look at: Dependence on an old version of a package. Philippe Veber Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:18:50 +0100 id:CAOOOohRJu0QH+czx3qAwNxCY0X9JBd4NdUd9vjBvt-kDFCHkmA@mail.gmail.c= om https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2023-12 https://yhetil.org/guix/CAOOOohRJu0QH+czx3qAwNxCY0X9JBd4NdUd9vjBvt-= kDFCHkmA@mail.gmail.com Cheers, simon