From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id GA11LqQNqWWaJwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:38:12 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GA11LqQNqWWaJwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:38:12 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=BBiiw1XM; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705577892; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=E1PtWnLBVVJGgsuVdaU70iFW+yh4py8ig3iJ3GDBQuo=; b=BWAW+KDH6vsgDmDjuke6jRp5DJevpeaTZl+BWHcIBIJ27XvjSgtDtVEKMJuAkcwhBZP2x4 tL5iEou0KuXR8YOkDn4h2lNA74Ob/2C2j8chhPgRIk4r9OrQXWO6rKacFNAaJiX0Cayoqf SOXtzPbQVJFHTbnfzoog+RBCZqoOPFigJ3XZ6QEUYBhYcVWSufApazz9JKiyDJtlEE/VBN S/3ZXvo92iTvN2CpIZFRs3VnJhe5Vr4qgmZ8Ldr+W48ntVryOp+A7sAiuQJte0EKqpk3oq lqyjVUl61nqor3mtm2dURD9Kwu7iAcYdvYPXcjaKO8BRd9348ZAJpYCwhMCK7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=BBiiw1XM; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705577892; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uY0YNYEy0LtYWCKlxR6rw0hdXNLIMJ+SfLyYxchdbjSA5GbfhBdJLogjlDj0jn2xj1Rv2M LJsKlfMa58tNlaNwecuu/Bs9zVEh1VJZGxzLx4iz0gx93QhQBbFCh11tjy1LElp0VaBPri W5ch0ziln9EWDIbt+44zDCiepG07mstL89IwkKIjPvVwNpx9Zd/0bklRSNMBi6g6GWDQo/ kg4O3V3C/7A/bVJqNJpNuPlvxAwP9cb9Csa0O623M+vuuKFvY4U66U2cZ1HRiNDvzK+xgQ y3KWA8tspDV9HVVuNM8dvE3/ckxa1qwQVCZ2s3ylgCShJAnjAQQH0SQO/XCXgw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECDB13B96 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:38:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQQih-0000AN-BV; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:38:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQQif-00005o-Bf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:38:01 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQQie-00021u-Eq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:38:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQQif-0003ig-VI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:38:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#68333: Time bomb in icedtea/openjdk Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68333 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Rostislav Svoboda Cc: 68333@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 68333-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68333.170557786014261 (code B ref 68333); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 68333) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2024 11:37:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54464 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQQiK-0003hw-Ev for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:37:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]:39352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rQQiG-0003hL-LG for 68333@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 06:37:37 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e60d74b81so3625535e9.1 for <68333@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 03:37:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705577849; x=1706182649; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=E1PtWnLBVVJGgsuVdaU70iFW+yh4py8ig3iJ3GDBQuo=; b=BBiiw1XMUxnJdUIX0EWKBcsesS4gOGtUURR1Uh/4Y2t8KNPsEdp0p5BG7qoPSY8Vv4 YG35zVdYi21yXurI97TwJMLz8H4XnrEVxhM7HpRJwOdK1p2Vu3EDRBYotcWbAuRyDvfB qHKj+dUeuilndKW3JqUO6A8gsy+dGnKvgG84SArwugIJhFWMIIQ1WCtcs+do6H2p4N8n hxA9+gdPRfkBBx5YxhmWLJkmVGogGC3Mlx+vbALf3Dcuj++gOvDgbmPJd017JOY6NByS UUqriTLSoZzWRxYLfHy+lICpv8qYhBAFmCoiUy6JcD7SyxjrKJ5f7Ko9BE7kYXbxM5il 4bdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705577849; x=1706182649; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E1PtWnLBVVJGgsuVdaU70iFW+yh4py8ig3iJ3GDBQuo=; b=Ieew5zzHXuk+VvFBR0VRj52/jAjUavOUkKfiCBPTGYhxjNQP63XUQyoMRJhjC2ti6T RrhpxsedMgi/AoXrQ6M/Vxe8wNU8E21VUKuozFwPWFWlrtMzXvTwCKBoKdGNoxLE06A2 Fny74fyJXwmaOOGZERreDVWAHrm9JCRjbyIO4qE5PiTwJ4mTmEvrZtsw2+zNx6PVGV2g tP3EhbZ/A1pJlOmF31DXl8C3ZCTDiV/vJbVLQ9nDvg9DRRj4DdZOWs7YUg+FJ8N+P3cW dfJoOnvrJSLE6LpJmmN9Mh/ktOGG+uumHfVVGeNJ30+yLQMvAdyDUnw+jlplXWRjoHYz POXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywbm3UpaZxxEaT7mgGKPG2+aZcFmzIWSUg5n+ELnnjoDNHx2Xb0 UZOLmm932zgawnA+j79tz62umIVO19BIgDtUez83axm9W0Si+aEp16iE/i/p X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4z6WyR8b6iUOiu3hbolk1AHr/4XRINGGj7OCMLd3ejbDcNVMMmq2+g4u/HtBITyrS0ZudtA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c12:b0:40e:6665:79a0 with SMTP id j18-20020a05600c1c1200b0040e666579a0mr1007000wms.0.1705577849322; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 03:37:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:c5b1:875f:77a0:578f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h17-20020a05600c499100b0040d6e07a147sm24608546wmp.23.2024.01.18.03.37.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 03:37:29 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier In-Reply-To: <87ply9tfxn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ply9tfxn.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:10:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6jaj3rj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.34 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: 2.34 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9ECDB13B96 X-TUID: r6tMK9bxK5l8 Hi, Thanks all for the quick fix. Well, I am asking here but maybe such discussion would deserve its own thread on guix-devel. :-) On mer., 10 janv. 2024 at 15:35, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Thanks for the quick investigation and patch! I just realized that this > affects current =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 so we=E2=80=99d rather fix it so= on. > > What do you think of the attached patch? The difference is that it > patches code at its root (in the actual source tarball rather than after > it=E2=80=99s been copied), it does so for IcedTea 7 and 8, and there are = patch > files that are slightly clearer than a substitution pattern. This fixes the future but not the past. Hum, headache with guix time-machine? :-) The question is twofold: 1. Do we document that some Java stack is broken for =E2=80=9Cguix time-machine=E2=80=9D? Other said, have we an evaluation about which G= uix revisions are broken for the stack of Java? 2. Do we provide a =E2=80=9Ctransformation=E2=80=9D for fixing such break?= Something that rewrite on the fly the origin for patching it; accessible only via manifest. WDYT? Cheers, simon