From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: List of abbreviations for licenses Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:24:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87fw3hmoo5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vcco2hgr.fsf@gnu.org> <87hao7zzgr.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3stprjs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th7HB-0006AE-TY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:24:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th7HA-0006jQ-Lc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:24:13 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:1184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th7HA-0006jL-Ce for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:24:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Nikita Karetnikov's message of "Sat, 8 Dec 2012 01:34:08 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nikita Karetnikov Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Nikita Karetnikov skribis: >> Can you make this a single #:export? > > Which one should I use? (The latter looks better, IMHO.) The latter, yes. >> While we=E2=80=99re at it, we should add a =E2=80=98url=E2=80=99 field t= o , so that the >> URL above would be a field of the license object instead of being a >> comment. > > I think that we should use 'uri' instead. [1] Well, in practice that=E2=80=99ll be URLs to descriptive documents, but eit= her way is fine with me. Ludo=E2=80=99.