From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#25669: Cannot build libsrtp (which qemu depends on) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:27:35 -0800 Message-ID: <87fujl6y3s.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y3xf8ai7.fsf@gmail.com> <871sv5651a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccRAF-0006ws-2O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:28:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccRAA-0000bc-Vl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:28:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccRAA-0000bG-SF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:28:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccRAA-0005T7-HR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:28:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <871sv5651a.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:43:13 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 25669-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludovic, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> Using an up-to-date guix (from git master), I cannot build the libsrtp >> package (v1.5.4) which Qemu requires. The check phase fails: >> >> cd test; /tmp/guix-build-libsrtp-1.5.4.drv-0/libsrtp-1.5.4/test/rtpw_tes= t.sh >/dev/null >> make: *** [Makefile:35: runtest] Error 255 >> phase `check' failed after 18.2 seconds > > I could reproduce it on my laptop, even though Hydra did have > substitutes. > > Fixed in commit 340f9b9fa0bdbe65c570b57504d39ff30fc1dd4a. > That was quick! Thank you! Maxim --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEJ9WGpPiQCFQyn/CfEmDkZILmNWIFAliertcACgkQEmDkZILm NWLH9g//UU6zzmT1DC0POIFfOsWiEWgaV9BtEznQZoxFg+zpwnoUTOus5yTGFi98 iamHWqFEclOX8uSNnUEpLJDsajeIARubXW+joCrjUvBBaB2IQO8s/FoWDI+BN95U tLdYHIdiTRd/HBwGxPHo4Q0tya4PLeWk7tcNN/VMQ8hNsnedWvfUhmfwvw355BJd E7fI3RfYp44fXqzOGQj7qTnezBuuuCRo87Mh/iYn6+rlm5TqXEkpNIVOXIUX7cWf e1BXS19xpQNd6/4v7kkw3btzp3ZuJ8p4v2MJVRFMqOXSJ1pBRXYBBQna8infhb0F B64jpU0bXWcttQJrYMMKMf4AJN2szPjklEDSx+KojOQccSd7VtxvttqYP5K4bkVq Soh7gyH3alcrWUndmj8xQksiHsdR877MbPJi3ukN14fEa+oAxqs/ycDKfcWcQPp8 26YkZ0EVGa4IyKIPACKuR2COqJYdlo4IbXQtZbSuDjHAErRzNisyCo8FFxZTYAmL S6E2Y3fmazb9VxD5EN7PFG1eucO8zcYGECe78vlIzn0tiJKdgxSeFi6SOhHoQ1qK cVcHfoCGQVc0oCZVZUFqmQV+/CyxcmrHV3+iYPkJ3G0zB4y2YRLgiagi+XJHfnmN 1Hp12AYGlAGkfWRDUFWVbTi0U2IoQJxMSd6u6SJYXTUDsuwaK1s= =TFvD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--