From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#29184: binutils 2.29 fails to set RUNPATH in gcc-cross-boot0 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:39:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87fu9q9xu4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874lq73vty.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33485) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eC1Ie-0002RU-89 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:40:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eC1IY-0002mq-M3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:40:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eC1IY-0002mg-I8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eC1IY-0003HG-80 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 05:40:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <874lq73vty.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2017 23:07:21 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 29184@debbugs.gnu.org Hi! Marius Bakke skribis: > I tried to cherry-pick the binutils 2.29 update > (b0a14e5628eb56052f0c3d21a7b5375f5813b01d), but it breaks the > 'validate-runpath' phase of gcc-cross-boot0: > > starting phase `validate-runpath' > validating RUNPATH of 8 binaries in "/gnu/store/ybh1ifgzs717mz5dp1pk2nrga= kqg1l8x-gcc-cross-boot0-5.5.0/libexec"... > /gnu/store/ybh1ifgzs717mz5dp1pk2nrgakqg1l8x-gcc-cross-boot0-5.5.0/libexec= /gcc/x86_64-guix-linux-gnu/5.5.0/cc1: error: depends on 'ld-linux-x86-64.so= .2', which cannot be found in RUNPATH ()=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Oh, it looks like this new Binutils adds ld-linux.so to NEEDED, which was not the case until now. I=E2=80=99ve looked at NEWS files but I don=E2=80=99t see where this is com= ing from. Could it be a problem on our side? BTW 2.29.1 is out. Ludo=E2=80=99.