From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#30566: While searching for packages, deprecated packages should be ignored Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:49:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87fu5m32tc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180221100316.42ccce5f@alma-ubu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqga0-0005H2-27 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:50:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqgZw-0002lO-3U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:50:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqgZv-0002kE-V0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:50:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqgZv-00045O-Ji for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:50:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180221100316.42ccce5f@alma-ubu> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?="'s message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:03:16 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 30566-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Bj=C3=B6rn, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > I have to look into the package sources to find out which of the two is > the not-deprecated one. Fixed in 0fb405796cdb5579c911b30da9d40b4a18cd7f07. Deprecated packages are entirely hidden in this case, which I think is the right thing: we don=E2=80=99t want people to use the deprecated name. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.