From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#38148: Guix packages old/broken version of qutebrowser Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:49:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftix9eqa.fsf@nckx> References: <20191109100530.zdfrewfmengq7pud@hooch.localdomain> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTw3-0003PV-IH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:50:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTw2-00058T-Cy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:50:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTw1-00058H-Vz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:50:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTw1-00069o-QZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:50:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <20191109100530.zdfrewfmengq7pud@hooch.localdomain> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Florian Bruhin Cc: 38148@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Florian, [I'm not a regular qutebrowser user, nor maintainer =E2=80=94 I don't=20 think we have one.] Florian Bruhin =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I'm the upstream author of qutebrowser - it looks like Guix=20 > currently packages > qutebrowser 0.11.0:=20 > https://guix.gnu.org/packages/qutebrowser-0.11.0/ > > That version is very outdated (July 2017, there have been 28 new=20 > releases since > then). It has various known security issues, but currently it=20 > just crashes > outright, because such an old version isn't compatible with Qt=20 > 5.11 which is > packaged in Guix. > > That results in me getting crash reports around once per week -=20 > at this point, > it'd probably be better to not package qutebrowser at all,=20 > seeing that nobody > seems to maintain that package for a long time now. Thank you for letting us know. My apologies for the noise from=20 these useless crash reports. Is there a supported way to replace the default bug report URL=20 with our own? If not, I could patch qutebrowser to pop up a dialogue with our=20 bug tracker (e-mail) address instead. The crash report itself=20 would likely be lost. I've tried qutebrowser 1.8.1 with QtWebKit and it runs, but then=20 freezes (@ 0% CPU) after some minutes. I had to SIGKILL it.=20 However, so does 0.11.0. I'll try to get it to run, and hopefully the state of=20 qutebrowser's dependencies in Guix will improve as well. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl3G7i0ACgkQ2Imw8BjF STwmCg//areiHAe++JpbOXDi5CjWsuZHFDd+HNqCyWZLMRXVGg3CO113YZIaFQcU 5FXvBDjlzPcT9chOIt1GsBkTWRdrDPRkYX4WNBFcJcZrfKLLsfHzFWHucCNKZbFB lkSE1sVClH9LpimJghEQ8+HkSSwhOe0CNmfjj1Dj4tVKiVXDv1k+zaDgoX4NN8FP eAHjLUmuhci7PL4Dd5mk6hA8jIt/P8w/FUXQzhaXs5t7wxdlwY4vmTQzhA6UkBQU BkrpUWwzl5xZt3H6OGYXLfpto2ajDKLuXfdvCJTyfhlpbB2+7837UEAiaNhVWGnZ cCJvM4Ibl7M+QJdYJBUQlNQlirwlCyzO8xdX5TJvtI6CsQRNe3V2qet0ynAWjMAS ykU/2aGYvZuTQ7TfXrdl485uMcAfAzgWvy87cLjzcMryv1Ca078/Ohp01IX3mz3j juL/2lwJ0yhRv5HtSQ4bV7jffnpR/64ZzRNp1dZyrge7RkGmUGIHiZUwrnVD2I08 b/PLMoCSkvnMbhAL7tT1yR9foxTVADeQsxbfBl6Hp9bUFzzPMvMQZYrXoH3LGelO ltz2iXIy3XpPyE8s9wGdOeoFKt8xDkEdfr32MMw0w9ZW3NYwdRHDrRGc8c7FsTJl HjdmT4fJB26au7FaFJUsucfpGR3GZVr0uYOBg1+kYoB3yul+by0= =wosX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--