From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0BbDKDVYIF8kIQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:54:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8KOSJDVYIF8qIQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:54:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E69C49401CF for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Srj-0004is-UD for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:54:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Sra-0004h0-Mq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:54:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Sra-0007NP-Db for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Sra-0005ZU-8E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42342: Wine64 segfaults (5.12/staging) Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42342 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Prikler Cc: 42342@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 42342@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.159595521821383 (code B ref -1); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:54:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2020 16:53:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58984 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0SrB-0005Yi-Gm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:53:38 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Sqy-0005YK-8z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:53:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Sqy-0004XA-0s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:53:24 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:44598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Sqw-0007If-7H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:53:23 -0400 Received: by tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9523beae; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:53:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=tobias.gr; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=2018; i=me@tobias.gr; bh=Fh62F4895me9J4LGOK+Cq8 HS+zTjCDQ1XuahzBGSSuk=; b=oOmJEo2WaO/iP8GL+maaqOLDi9fzEYLIvj2CZT 13pkZv9Bhx+Y7WqjQeQmshVrQeBI99knx3UxAhw58Oqr6JwX3yDwFgFR9kxwGxGJ 1PC5YGa03TuWRcYxameScX2PMvTYYQZ5QkzGaLDFnbPT2W8l5DlbsTxAes7xS+Sr tKSTRIB0njf7q9Dk+EhSMIauqOb1yg4/mrOTABirfUhN+n6LJpQFCG7YenUh4tpi 84kM4zpLnCdcopNup095X5QUuWoaqILRzsYlagT1T6cBkEbo5xgidHdd4LOfjedT 00rD5AgMmoGvHEV2wThg0mTgdJd13E1G7qmN9bqxWjT0CoaQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 331c7d5e (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:53:36 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; References: <0f14a6d95dbdd04c8ff9da03a47f0d205a5e1002.camel@student.tugraz.at> In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:53:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87ft9bzim7.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=oOmJEo2W; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-TUID: JeNvME+QbYml --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Prikler =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I'll use inferiors as a local workaround for the time being and=20 > wait > for the problem to be fixed upstream. I'll also look into 5.9=20 > to 5.11 > and perhaps provide a proper downgrade patch later on. I admit to being a bit confused. IIRC on #guix you reported that=20 wine-staging was broken, not wine64-staging. If you only want to=20 downgrade the latter, that's all right by me, but I consider that=20 one of the risks of using the staging branch to begin with. Is there a reason you rely on staging, and the 64-bit version to=20 boot? Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXyBYAAAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eSKpAP94t/9rbsD5WEBilX4asX52FQ2xl4aL5DynzRcGOHGYPAEAhSKkVVdMhkXx zjDi3On0zZUTNMRsL4r/SkqGBeoNuAc= =uOG5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--