From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OBw3Bu3TkV8rEwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:48:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id qDyYAO3TkV/zYQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:48:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC63940149 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37964 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVfdC-0005CK-7d for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:48:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVfd4-0005Br-0s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:48:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVfd3-0006J3-Od for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:48:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVfd3-0006C6-KE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44000: Guile-Git cross-compiled to i586-pc-gnu gets bytestructures wrong Resent-From: Taylan Kammer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44000 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 44000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44000.160339243423751 (code B ref 44000); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 44000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2020 18:47:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVfcH-0006B0-S6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:47:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com ([209.85.208.48]:38841) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVfcG-0006Am-ID for 44000@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:47:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id bc23so2778246edb.5 for <44000@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rcfvNIwTyEf4+cCbRw1fHkpmc/NI1d0Ts6mEkXQrPMw=; b=eDdxgMAnk2dW7jqdtEn7lfKUN9ivccOtyvoOGCdx9cDh1mP2pUqcKe7XfuyjtOGARA Nr5Hz3em07jwiXE3ZuX0hOdDW9KtfhCZEjOjWKS0lTN38L5z+Xmp0N8V/HOLNHvUXCwQ 4++O21nu/BbVOYRVNWD9CWulyYBXYyG8zLOxQnQcFIcx8EQ2nD+I7yxj99kJHqTMr8Ud Gi5eoBeJ75xWNhbxkWi3xfCXnEt228P7hAhkDHVIqCndDBaGMUh2WUv0DGb+FjktrVRq K9/Cc/W6ypVvDz0zZPVWltzbvpXenfBMrijIpFMi+RSvi4ZoERYmao2EZL+ty2oAPnDz W13g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rcfvNIwTyEf4+cCbRw1fHkpmc/NI1d0Ts6mEkXQrPMw=; b=SGKAPQCYXlEPTDwHTTHMmzl1fZDRHR8Pm4k2FWoCf+ef/9u/6ZtbQz5dWjeJw8Xl2e YGORAcquR/HegeTyz8R2yj7E5fFRVpIzEZLEXYwjAMg3QqzFuWSZ0x/xsRKFYzuxhaHn w97fEQg8RZZwq9nW9svmu4kPlWvaHqEA9FJSaSLcg7ML6t24xSeiyOjpWtG6f6ExMTHb gqZqAQvH54M7+JczVQznfrFK4Q1iQetOXC/1D31SFw7MnWhiXI4+K2C+3E57SpcB6qPj CY4eI7UIaPaYnQYTJf4eGwvBOfZoGmkuTTsb80sUF/naByBT2McUK26QCcdGnMdm8ehG Fifg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JH+18S8gGEvKfzRIFFeoTB5LxmNqSt3A8HLtK8bk+p1XaK+Cz d4CGLhFp9EAGHtKmCW52aPHN6PJAxMs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKmFQ0z+Lktdu2izscOh0VN+6W2T+738UfeB1o4nGrop16c9SgcfF0hlm51M/ZMIxClhyWiw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:e40c:: with SMTP id d12mr3467733edm.35.1603392426371; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guixsd ([2a02:908:c71:ba60::993e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k23sm1298588ejs.100.2020.10.22.11.47.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:47:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Taylan Kammer References: <87v9fccuml.fsf@inria.fr> <871ri0c4u8.fsf@gnu.org> <1325d1c4-e047-76e5-2180-672fef7238b9@gmail.com> <87mu0kn3wh.fsf@gmail.com> <87blgy39q7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87blgy39q7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:23:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87ft66umhj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44000@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eDdxgMAn; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: zV7CZESRdY5i Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Taylan Kammer skribis: > >> Could you please test whether bytestructures 1.0.8 fixes the issue? > > Thanks for the prompt reply! I tested 1.0.8 and it does not fix the > problem. > > I think the problem might be that the =E2=80=98cond-expand-provide=E2=80= =99 call might > affect a module that=E2=80=99s not the one tested in (eval '(cond-expand = =E2=80=A6) =E2=80=A6). > > Does that make sense? Yes, you're right. I've made another release (1.0.9), where I use (environment '(guile) '(bytestructures guile numeric-data-model)) for the 'base-environment' binding in case we're running on Guile. It now gives me correct results locally (woe on me for not having properly tested the previous one) so I think it should definitely work when cross-compiling too, since the 'eval' is sure to be executed at run-time and not compile-time... Fingers crossed, I hope I don't waste your time this time! - Taylan