From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AHGsNwkOQWBAfgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:42:49 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id YIlqMwkOQWBFWwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:42:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492FD1B9F7 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:42:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41384 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHr3o-0007v9-Gw for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:42:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHr1B-0006Mh-LN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:40:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHr18-0001Am-Eg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:40:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHr18-0001Ib-9H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45962: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98binutils-mesboot0=E2=80=99?= includes non-zero timestamps in ar archives Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45962 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Received: via spool by 45962-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45962.16148759604902 (code B ref 45962); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 45962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2021 16:39:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59994 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHr0R-0001Gz-TU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:39:20 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:39049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHr0J-0001Gf-G7 for 45962@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:39:18 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f43.google.com with SMTP id k7so11209546qvo.6 for <45962@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:39:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dIfRmdyVxbwj0DFfYRAAhaezN5l+753JhkMxnKED8pg=; b=g1/Boyt6AMbJshWRXCwVbelRSOhvmGE5KdotypKd/vC8eZKT0o65VudXcbQOTU389C W7N7llPIZ4swvsNoxNqxE4jRxd/KuE97CUVtSLZGxeewG3Sg8RUh++0oi6lIIifN3wXw 8WNwZPvVUKDavQXc6ctRJ5mCcnIKj7gFP7LBh7J08vMNWEzGudVdcfLH+6pQy1p30RT0 z1TF1VmBcN+x2TkK1+VlAF7BKBXYs3MjN3ZKwICnY3qYq1vV7K0ehzVjVLXwUFhyyS3O 7jEs8bunE8AdX9yBWlN5dgJceVlEeuhK5hFZzVwzt8WXRLPGyOBKRr2S+fNOsP65CsOE Sf4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dIfRmdyVxbwj0DFfYRAAhaezN5l+753JhkMxnKED8pg=; b=CiDaKCtIsp7d8mdlfzqfT0eYDROSI+mDnDsdvzfhPPwIcGWcxOQIWxnuVu7r9teppO y6GIgcqWsYL2ziKCzBWaSClcO+/RUoWbjFU0uVt6NB9XDJcEBWofoKGNgc3SQg6AjE6x cGISitu3OsOZJU7IYe7SN4TFp/zvx7tSmpSUKdNFOXdxdX4i4+1UybpSicHqikYoXv0+ YJEyzE4meYO92hxRqxDohTRPejPLpvhTeZyae3O3RhJ0M81VjZmoF14o7onL8Ppaiwyb ik6F4z2Ct6i+tRGTdOZrjRgscvbdtzH8ZeFM72KyZJdGTb9A0YPUDn/am2pLTruvyhg0 ItjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304akYOoikYwTQNXZpkOjSebGDtJyvaxvzXmFqM8N4NLzaqcRuc ZlebqHSU0YJk5GBjiAj/r8ZVL6qk8DgBtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcspMPju7IqlqAtp5QAhiTZ7Km2Pna2WCTl1x6MO7vKXK0UUMxlWOq13NzMzk65RIeK2C1Aw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a8d3:: with SMTP id h19mr4534064qvc.21.1614875945682; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:39:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-132-106.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.132.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2sm19300795qkk.96.2021.03.04.08.39.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:39:05 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87im7ujgqz.fsf@inria.fr> <87lfb4s5z7.fsf@gnu.org> <8735xc86ne.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:39:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8735xc86ne.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Wed, 03 Mar 2021 18:54:29 +0100") Message-ID: <87ft1aq3fb.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45962@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614876169; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=dIfRmdyVxbwj0DFfYRAAhaezN5l+753JhkMxnKED8pg=; b=rckf5a/ddfRM3q8AbofH0Jo824y71bVVOQfdjAD5YIDGo/uom4cFX1hWrZNbutpyNnFG5i +eWg8F9S53eGWJBQ6EczGSVdg9BCk5/lZchf8fbheWoSe62wxGZBWS3EzNvS/wDPsWgu4N Y/+r++yeH3RVQjx9B9m/kdAHKi3FeKDwtjmJBbuMS4Myx47jlYWzJJ/yrIkK1Vfh9/Du0u TUrSOT+7D3lBwX9dr7PV+kWPW5swmSnUNi/KBoh0Kn3brE0VBTV/aUJdkOqsCHi6Qajfcs zWNWilPVH9edI5f3I2Agr1uBKqwdEkcvfqvKHbd8UOiTMASMG8DoR2waSwfo5Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614876169; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=K6jQzZvT7OeyflNBI9uLzTBvEsGFnDkORCsnLq7QraVZRlOF84IN3Brgp9Ivs5c9S+2stI kvBL1SpXPQ0Z6HP4WD0KMyqu3zQlVnUKzi4VFtBdgD3kqYL+zOxItInHLnzGiNhLX5gbq2 tqJ8pt6n7wFvUexSBw25izCZB6dtBZHKg/IBPe8M3y/uhKr5+cgBoBc62ewEAMqeyNqcub 8zBPNXBEg87f+Odjx2O8Pk66q4qYs00TRwm3094zjNkOz83Y6e8IbZiGrmdvmoBaoTBtRL SzZmlPEEHhaACDyzfV1z64J0IrLP3c9hQ6Y3oMCCTNrME0gDf4C5MON99duFxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="g1/Boyt6"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="g1/Boyt6"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 492FD1B9F7 X-Spam-Score: -1.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: DLHXnU4mf8kq Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > Hello! > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: >> >>> On #bootstrappable, mid-kid reported that =E2=80=98binutils-mesboot0=E2= =80=99 in >>> commencement.scm lacks =E2=80=98--enable-deterministic-archives=E2=80= =99. So I checked >>> if this had an effect by running: > >> [...] >> >>> Apparently Binutils 2.14 didn=E2=80=99t have =E2=80=98--enable-determin= istic-archives=E2=80=99 >>> so we=E2=80=99ll have to patch it. >> >> Sikonas on #bootstrappable provided a patch for that (thanks!) so I went >> ahead and gave it a try on =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 (Guix patch at= tached). > > Great! > >> The binutils source gets patched and repacked, but then decompressing it >> fails: > > [..] > >> Maxime, does that ring a bell? Could it be that this bootstrap =E2=80= =98xz=E2=80=99 is >> less capable, or could it be a Gash-Utils bug? > > Currently, we avoid using non-bootstrapped binaries in the bootstrap, > that includes 'xz'; earlier in the bootstrap that includes also 'patch'. > > See also gcc-core-mesboot0: it applies the patch in a manual phase. So > I'm not sure if we want to start depending on 'xz' an this stage? I see; so what Ludovic got surprised by is the fact that when adding patches or a snippet to an origin it gets repacked as an xz tarball. That's nothing new (it's how it is on the master branch too); but it can indeed be surprising. Maxim