From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Distro name
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:32:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87ehi36u19.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1357167116.1974@bluehome.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40965)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TqXnN-0004Ij-27
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:32:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1TqXnL-0003nH-Gg
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:32:24 -0500
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:60512)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1TqXnL-0003n5-Ae
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:32:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1357167116.1974@bluehome.net> (Jason Self's message of "Wed, 02
	Jan 2013 14:51:56 -0800 (PST)")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jason Self <jason@bluehome.net>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

"Jason Self" <jason@bluehome.net> skribis:

> Hmm. It might make sense to differentiate when a third party is=20
> involved, but not when the GNU Project itself is doing it.=20

[...]

> I guess it depends on what you define an "an official complete GNU=20
> system release" to be. That would ultimately have to come from RMS,=20
> of course, but if the only difference is the kernel (but both kernels=20
> are official GNU packages) and the distro offered the option of using=20
> both of them, the line seems perhaps a little bit more blurry in that=20
> regard.

Hmm yes, that makes sense (and indeed, the longer-term goal is to
support several kernels.)

That would comfort me in choosing the (gnu ...) name space.

Ludo=E2=80=99.