From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?UTF-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=) Subject: bug#25254: [minor] 'About' page says GuixSD is a "GNU/Linux distribution" Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:55:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87eg0ywek5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r34ywqat.fsf@gmail.com> <87inqawkar.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKWsp-0004rp-EP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:56:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKWsk-0005Ly-Hn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:56:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKWsk-0005Lq-D2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cKWsk-0003HO-1W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:56:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (David Craven's message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:36:47 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: David Craven Cc: 25254@debbugs.gnu.org David Craven writes: >> I don't think this is the place to discuss that particular issue at >> large. That can be done on Wikipedia, or elsewhere. > >> I think the Guix project authors probably agree on GuixSD being defined >> as a GNU distribution. The question is whether or not to make the About >> page consistent with that. > > Ah sorry, I misunderstood your intention. I thought this was about > changing a Wikipedia article. No problem. Using accurate terminology on Wikipedia is an intention of mine, and changing the About page (and the FSF's endorsed distros page) not to call GuixSD a GNU/Linux distro would help in that regard, but it's arguably a petty issue so I don't intend to bother others with it. :-) (And a guix bug report wouldn't be the place to discuss it anyway.) Taylan