From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#25988: [PATCH] bug#25988: python2-urwid tests fail Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 16:47:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87efw83a8a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87innn8goq.fsf@gmail.com> <87o9vsh19x.fsf@gmail.com> <8737d4ks8l.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9veo0n7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5CcP-00086A-Ta for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 10:48:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5CcM-0003y2-Sc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 10:48:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5CcM-0003xu-OU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 10:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5CcM-0001az-Hb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 10:48:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87o9veo0n7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:44:12 +0900") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 25988-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > > [...] > >> >> I=E2=80=99ve seen the failure once and it succeeded on a subsequent rebu= ild, so >> I came to the conclusion that this is a non-deterministic failure. That >> would explain why the problem doesn=E2=80=99t show up on Hydra. >> >> Does it fail systematically for you? >> > > Yes, it does! I can re-run the `guix system reconfigure ...' as > many times as I want and always get the same two failures. However, if I > keep the failed derivation and run the tests manually, I've found that > using 'strace' will cause more failures/errors; so it seems > non-deterministic; maybe a racing issue? > > I've opened an issue on their GitHub tracker > (https://github.com/urwid/urwid/issues/230). Interestingly the same > tests run fine with Python 3, with or without using strace. > > I've attached a patch that disables the problematic vterm tests, only > for the python2-urwid package. Sounds reasonable to me. > Maxim > > From 56e769bee4a47136e0eee251c87a58b8359a8611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Maxim Cournoyer > Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:55:47 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Disable vterm tests for python2-urwid > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python2-urwid)['delete-test_vterm]: Add phase = to > delete problematic test modules. Applied, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.