From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found:
	libjpeg
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:25:28 +0100
Message-ID: <87efona8s7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87po8vm4iv.fsf@gnu.org> <874lq6hbxn.fsf@netris.org>
	<87h8u6m311.fsf@gnu.org> <878tfhlxia.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20171108101226.GD1815@macbook41> <87k1z0hlpr.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87po8kldgk.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmk4v6p6.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87a7zmliu6.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60577)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eIHjr-0008Fv-B2
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:26:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eIHjm-0002TK-DV
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:26:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47580)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eIHjm-0002SG-AY
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:26:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eIHjm-0004rq-1k
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:26:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.29186.B29186.151154433218657@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87a7zmliu6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:37:53 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: 29186@debbugs.gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:
>>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-emacs: Resurrect, fixes #29186.
>>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/guile-emacs-fix-configure.patch: New file.
>>
>>> I=E2=80=99m fine with this patch.  I=E2=80=99m a bit concerned about th=
e risk of
>>> accumulating patches that should really be in guile-emacs proper,
>>> though.  IMO it would be better if this patch were pushed to
>>> guile-emacs, or if an alternate guile-emacs repo were set up if the
>>> current one is inactive.  If that=E2=80=99s too cumbersome though, feel=
 free to
>>> push this patch!
>>
>> Meanwhile, I sent this patch 6 days ago to Robin Templeton <robin@igalia=
.com>.
>> They were the most recent committer from where we're pulling.  They have=
n't
>> responded yet.  Let me know if you know a better address/can we do bette=
r?
>>
>> I can wait a bit more and push if I don't hear anything the coming week.
>
> Yes, that sounds like the best approach.

I think you can now push the patch in Guix.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.