From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#35521: Mariadb test suite failures on x86_64-linux Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:32:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87ef2xlgmb.fsf@netris.org> References: <87tveemt19.fsf@netris.org> <87tveemt19.fsf@netris.org> <87h8aemrow.fsf@netris.org> <87pnmil8dq.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87wogpn6f7.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlKFv-0001sw-Qu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:36:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlKFu-0004ww-Gs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:36:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlKFu-0004vM-6t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:36:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlKFu-0002g7-0V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:36:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87wogpn6f7.fsf@devup.no> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: Platoxia , 35521@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Marius Bakke writes: > Chris Marusich writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been encountering this failure off and on for a few weeks now, and >> I'd like to help fix it. In short, it seems like non-deterministic test >> failures, to me. I think we should gather data and report the issue >> upstream, and maybe disable the offending tests in the meantime. > > I agree. I notice many of these failing tests are for the TokuDB > backend, which I doubt anyone is using in Guix anyway. > > Here is a patch that disables all tests mentioned in this report. I > would like to push it to core-updates. Are there others? I'm concerned by how frequently and casually we simply disable failing tests. What is the utility of running test suites at all, if this is how we respond? It makes me wonder how many programs are subtly broken on my Guix system because of this widespread practice. Mark