From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36517: 'guix deploy' does not restart services Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87ef1ay9za.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnmof4lf.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878st4vb74.fsf@gnu.org> <874l3sqz7n.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9w7dlw5.fsf@gnu.org> <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1W0V-0007pn-2T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:23:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1W0U-0002A6-8a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:23:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1W0U-00029x-59 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:23:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1W0U-0006zc-02 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 09:23:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87woglc0vz.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> (Jakob L. Kreuze's message of "Sat, 13 Jul 2019 13:14:40 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" Cc: 36517@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Jakob, zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Oh, I see. To me that=E2=80=99s completely orthogonal to =E2=80=98guix d= eploy=E2=80=99 though, >> in that =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98guix depl= oy=E2=80=99 should use the >> same code for that. >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Yeah, I believe it would be safe to close this once the code for 'guix > deploy' and 'guix system reconfigure' is unified. I opened this under > the impression that the two would remain separate and individual changes > would need to occur for both. Unless I=E2=80=99m mistaken, this bug can be closed now, right? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.