From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#37744: Per-user profile directory hijack (CVE-2019-17365 for Nix) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:23:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87eezcogtf.fsf@nckx> References: <87o8yjsr8o.fsf@gnu.org> <87blujsqq0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2xno85o.fsf@nckx> <87d0eyuqzd.fsf@gnu.org> <87mue2nkrj.fsf@nckx> <8736fttby6.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv89rnva.fsf@gnu.org> <878spksty3.fsf@gnu.org> <20191016142221.qys2y2cb4spmwscq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ftjsoh40.fsf@nckx> <20191016151922.5fanqbt6kiv4offx@pelzflorian.localdomain> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKl9f-0003Py-4e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:24:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKl9e-0002Sk-8S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:24:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKl9e-0002SY-5L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKl9d-00033K-S4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:24:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <20191016151922.5fanqbt6kiv4offx@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 37744@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-security@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice=20 > wrote: >> blah blah blah > > Sorry for being imprecise. I meant on Guix System. Sorry for misreading, you're right that it shouldn't be needed (or=20 recommended IMO). Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2nNdwACgkQ2Imw8BjF STyFyxAAladP1ST+Td9ix4x2FEaIjZ44ZITbeSip50xvdIaOX65kxS7gib1Zq6xm nRPnTSwlbq9iTOnerGUDG3s5uDcWl/AJEmhUqHC7PReDCHdRGrxbq/iWWPsXLcf7 ZFydaY0t+DW4iGa1GGPzWo/qCOpvngdh8yloImR7TOApNXljtlWNFTErwxuF9s3d YjrZFSUIIXfxV+bmP1yePLOqAdEivAMvN5bd43Z2ufHgKNGNU1pkoQcGlondyQq7 jYv68jtaCbdVdymCHUZsChdp2RgnWLQTAYCkiBNaK5AWlxwtE9aNk6IxlFrH5T87 p10RXkz5xPOb7/464K6yXQgEr29wXSibFrHCSBvVAHisAdVw+dQJk8RcUSWdk2LY LgJKHted2tLs0Z+trtkqGa0269+a2vCgGotBu0Sy12QfLsMjatGNdky4wsjCDbRu ahaD3vYxhxtZav1pUBgInpdD/y5W58JpPdaNCwfJ4chtNkirb4soA2U57ffLthp7 u05BvRp+dr9YB2ZANsaIJ+SacRpPtA+MKUOL2V8zSWNVZR6YUXV84RhzbNh4puSi 1iwWky0PmyYthM8UqbEQ5TrI0D8ygZSwoBrorIezuKEsBQtZuZuuW+Bjcr6hkpAK 3TD7Am8Xoj00sQElGIDeOfUDtKS5kogsqazA0Q1lyDgFHNIxnbs= =SOn3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--