From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4E6OH5v4SF9uEgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:29:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id mJNeG5v4SF/2GwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:29:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A489401CF for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60368 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdVK-00012H-0v for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:29:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdV9-0000zY-4V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:29:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdV8-0002iX-6c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdV8-0003vp-3y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:29:02 -0400 Subject: bug#42814: request: make guix upgrade recognize --do-not-upgrade Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 42814 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jesse Gibbons Mail-Followup-To: 42814@debbugs.gnu.org, othacehe@gnu.org, jgibbons2357@gmail.com Received: via spool by 42814-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D42814.159861771815003 (code D ref 42814); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 42814-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2020 12:28:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdUj-0003tu-Td for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:28:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdUe-0003tC-Cl for 42814-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:28:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdUZ-0002HO-41; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:28:27 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:590f:fb82:c6d1:db3] (port=37626 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kBdUT-0001Kg-SC; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:28:23 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <6f97171f-73ac-8289-d006-e379d00c0785@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:28:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6f97171f-73ac-8289-d006-e379d00c0785@gmail.com> (Jesse Gibbons's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:37:06 -0600") Message-ID: <87eenr0xb0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 42814-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: NxnsWudqNPOw Hello, > As you can see, this is quite a bit more complex than it needs to be. > > So, why not have guix upgrade recognize the --do-not-upgrade option? Thanks for the suggestion, it has been implemented by Jakub with 7ba7d50f92416821ec4fc124a49d74149b6d4d33. Mathieu