From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MHZ9O66ComDhogAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 16:50:22 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id ELArN66ComCwXgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 14:50:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B9F24730 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 16:50:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35338 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZX-0007rt-QL for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:50:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZG-0007pL-7o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:50:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZF-0003wj-Vu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:50:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZF-00084o-UH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48468: substitute server connection timeout Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48468 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Baines X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 48468@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162126299931033 (code B ref -1); Mon, 17 May 2021 14:50:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2021 14:49:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZD-00084T-38 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:49:59 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36806) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZ9-00084K-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:49:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZ9-0007kn-Dt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:49:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZ8-0003sN-6g; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:49:55 -0400 Received: from [109.190.253.11] (port=55430 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lieZ7-0002KA-Mq; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:49:54 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87lf8e4l42.fsf@gnu.org> <87eee6cz75.fsf@cbaines.net> Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 16:49:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eee6cz75.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of "Sun, 16 May 2021 19:26:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87eee59zzm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48468@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621263022; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=sCDOF83FA9e8dx1HztzKaPdZC5JWvf07D8OIalX2mwU=; b=ufLUDy0S97R95We45HD6t5qn8pw8W4xg7vfZrhQ4qaKC8LKpq33bP2S/ngjcLDKODmv2SZ zgoxEP4bf+eN0fkkZjcY+yvh4gMOt94yNFwO0Dyl51cCAIPIjllitp7wHTShkIRSjJp5Qp CmVyx7sSy5+zMfNcksbXmBLBxPJEi6evNrzRWyDnHUGGSY+DTlFEd19bViQBcfUsniH1CV ejq6YBVYy3S0zHggZvuXzAVF38syfJrhmyukuRdbqQDOAWNnO3wz+mTbpIuh0BTki44u/e reeM/V7f1PQAIkoZdsbsY6hCBtq7l8HY8+Uti4WhkkGVaBa/aKYsz2t2MQ2ZyQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621263022; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DuL/0nCCYSNppIWCasonCPIRF4eSgQIYOwAd9t4yPwqpsEHA8pmKTDnQ9YSgVFRxF70ajT pevLTXDsoqDw8iQxKWfqc/9UnIMQZmJIXk3rFKKqdIPIJqAAHb69g59iOc8U7PMr9VwSr7 7z/9nsXt7Hm6ZFMVquuIApvIlb9XQ+ypVvccuaW2i984lvzbEsV77/a4Ekz1UCdMZbxRPa xCRonfXZe0sp6X4oNKfC2DTAIfhYGoWHq8fg6yRSxGVNs0JhQbeYznKm+3iTqnnCahdSu7 U0vUlhNUQvKRznvogjOd8JVJ4KTVa4nsZ2bQ9PftUPHCSxJjzPVmBnH9mod8sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.44 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 34B9F24730 X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 91N0d05w9z9g Hey, > That's on the server side, the actual problem is probably on the client > side, as I guess there are possibly places where closed connections > aren't handled properly. This reminds me I sent some patches relating to > closing connections, this could well be related [1]. Oh, you're right, the Nginx server probably makes the difference here. The http-write procedure of the Guile (web server http) module seems to handle keep-alive connections. However, the wrapping http-write procedure of (guix scripts publish) may not. I'll have a closer look, thanks for your help. Mathieu