From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id CN0TNDOvTGMsAAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:26:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6PZbMzOvTGOXWAEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:26:11 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C88535B1A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 03:26:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50500 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okEtN-0003KE-NC for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:26:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okEtG-0003K0-Md for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:26:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okEtG-0000HD-FL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okEtG-0004rw-7J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25018: GC incorrectly removes the temporary root file of the calling process Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25018 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 25018@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25018-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25018.166596995418691 (code B ref 25018); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 25018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2022 01:25:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okEt7-0004rN-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:25:54 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:37661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1okEt5-0004qt-9t for 25018@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:25:52 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id m6so5838166qkm.4 for <25018@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cBukZNAJwM+8waoELSpa/7ecruVjmjxVY56PWpVDVes=; b=POq0Dlpyv1s9xyCnCuFZ1NIntkfzCEyb2oFTnUFh2i0J28e6mNNqy1iK37jXsbbicH Gg+VnuiWCzp57TXmXgRn0kY4SAqCnuxRWNDJyu0b50O7HaI88/2JAdnOHbpUkIJDCYSO aVqIjIbqWpoKkHo/XA3mvmXMo1WCvDEbYi34aq31LdTZI9vaKMfv7r5BBBFrD16lksFc F61zxOJtvhNyRpcshI6FNWgZTcZz7224Vllo7/sIvaWgHi1eK/PBMmwAL9FRiuXho7zo kcAb0V0L8Czf3LLjxYvJr4SYwE0PArh7VU19espFixfBpASbiQXvf1krYdhFchC/JB28 UXbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cBukZNAJwM+8waoELSpa/7ecruVjmjxVY56PWpVDVes=; b=tDufJqbOYRaXICdsIeH5iTVSlxEvArNu4XNdxOmoo6rgV3GNedB0/oMBFSHv3SEfjz c63p4MDL8EBpzx7joNlnOs9y+F7ayviiHqz/uZ9ENlMQykDEBsuzOGm9PaGRSVwlVUvy 2qolDJF5lJtdtWGAIhcPIHG0ncpbrR2WFAcUdE/K371W14qX2Y0Yb/+QBFOP4v6npMsJ bbSaWeOHCA/a9gcoCkI0hb8yNlvskGhzOCX3JcCnVydpcFJK8+4KrZiVboYG3A36vRB3 baFxc9PEfWQHYtgt72nAl77oPD3WepKANy+dJxnc1dGXuzMQGCOaVmJHECIyV9N/iZOv r6kg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3XpisEbCyPk0KPxkI3dreQ/LcwFDTJuSDVUObugkgMkm5nh/U+ rG0MEYkBeJmery3DEVg6J8o2XmM3D0Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6cp5VVQHzAqMih68oF89S/2PhsMXq2byvTB7himZSEDe6+MLgXd0rHYbh61EzSF3QHrAp+ew== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:13e1:b0:6ee:9408:1f90 with SMTP id h1-20020a05620a13e100b006ee94081f90mr6132915qkl.502.1665969945635; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-150-158.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.150.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a26-20020ac8721a000000b00398ed306034sm6700229qtp.81.2022.10.16.18.25.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:25:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87d1hl55ur.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmf34afr.fsf@gmail.com> <87zge43y6a.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn92jggr.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:25:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wn92jggr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2022 22:30:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87edv7z1ev.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1665969971; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=cBukZNAJwM+8waoELSpa/7ecruVjmjxVY56PWpVDVes=; b=hGU6xS5LI4hfyUUWUcvIAoifU93RoAagyosCD+j5zJ6zU/al83CDaglahUmlySGtdpkOWR oF/dtX+XGHyYrs+38zG8ZP/VVrxi+Ma1gRZ5Mp9uO+ROtsQwPwnsBLJedFrk77fBuVN5tz gfdJC9/0zxgM4QhzK8v5/YVGMxHK5ucgFIubNLNmlFnHn2SRXfwMY0CaytQp5cKCR6UUY4 8EEsuIOpfrlwBOvpIdeuCTax6g02DSOwwNh76oQzT9J7BkyQgfQ3Ejh4FCQPquDwbpDzue Ea2Ma12FBYZAJSAdRcYgAcVl2TsGz02HKS5WJFshLJQ1K29fp94Mop9QuR91ow== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1665969971; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RSxDcWPSWDYHI8YtUEmsyPVVE2+LLODKbQIzfS/i7OzeHr/o6PnIKghV46z7Q9LmfI/87Y tvJAoHBhHmZNfJjFspcs1RVYSJ0f980JVrqtzTW5W72GLGhzGg4mOEgVfuc/Nexd1lFs0J aiPnWS1NvxUXuvG/T2E2oZwIulMAhQmnVtayA6GBaAh4BORsC/E3Si6P7Yns1780kuAF3C AvjaskBZR4EwIhoCiy+Y1xG/VZ2dIwDYxZKpTI6TMO0T+iuIVWM7/UaVQDnRttTSyPpJ0/ NjtvSsT95OjXk32zCjaobk1aUaTE7MJM3sdHajSURX56b4Y+Pqu4kciv3KHtqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=POq0Dlpy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 4.69 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=POq0Dlpy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8C88535B1A X-Spam-Score: 4.69 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: tIJleA/y9utg Hi Ludovic! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Maxim, > > (Stripping Cc:.) > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > >> Thank you! (Your bug triage work is much appreciated!) We could turn >> the example here in a unit test; the only downside is that running the >> GC in a test is expensive. > > Actually, there are tests that most likely relied on the previous > behavior and are now failing in > tests/{derivations,nar,publish,pypi,store}.scm. We=E2=80=99ll have to lo= ok at > each one to make sure they are indeed making the wrong assumption and to > fix them. Hmm, I hadn't seen that coming. > What about reverting the change first so we can do that without > pressure and come up with a self-contained patch? Sounds reasonable, if we can't think of an immediate fix. --=20 Thanks, Maxim