From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id QMePInmp5GVarAAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:49 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id QMePInmp5GVarAAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:49 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=jpoiret.xyz header.s=dkim header.b=BGnhW0Km; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709484409; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=Vk4bXWWN25OAGyNvv0gU6PRC9QlmKss02I8w0hdzJ8U=; b=axDyiGofoIQSQ0fI7rIGAq6Yb7MrorOwXrv9U07cOlHCBsGMncKrjvMVn4QFxBwvClA260 bJ08x+GnB6MWVs9Shm5WQTujcox7frItsTDrxtpd//QBJkoHdQZ/oPV3r6XzrAzUQxV6nt vE9Ua25EvJcRHzTvjyVa0CLcorTePmy5WklQIi+tYoR15JQ2YQEV66UOyDVKoXMiv2BsJ4 c2W9pdS8MOCBssnGk2CAH7FfG/Yf4TYwe1PtgTbKwJ6mut2qjNvjkSagS68uZ1sMGmjKbh Cuq1ph7VlwGKTy0UUeXUu9l3rTo/KG3tR/4ku0vLQOaQY109qizJYBua8FmNEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=jpoiret.xyz header.s=dkim header.b=BGnhW0Km; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709484409; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AM7cuNbrCuz47rkhcjrWWY/ti3ZgvVpMd27jxu076lXfTDfU/Q0U9jD+074H1ZkUIkppXy sBOCSTCNHSdSrgQ/1TaQ20WmO04PI4TBAckBBsi5EHrQOg3QV4pgGP2vNhCDK4URIhr0Ar VnSPNVuwdee8IznKVa95ElkP1GH+zeg+kxv2iDLK7ROVj95u/7Ho+sK5hEq8+qAcT15khP ip78saeILnQyF02IjDeJiBQxTqNQLrk479KT+sQgeYGDaEh2FelXsQL+nkEJ1DW9T2YMIX 669hx4FcPqS7vSkGZKDRpwWkRWXZD+jqQKNsi8iXZtgNO3Bj95RHhvh8W7UG5g== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E9D5CC4F for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 17:46:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgoyw-0007y1-Or; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgoyv-0007xa-Jf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:33 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgoyv-0007HP-5O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgozO-00035O-5q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69487: Regression regarding guix shell and its "pure" flag? Resent-From: Josselin Poiret Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69487 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= A. Gomes , 69487@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69487-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69487.170948441711851 (code B ref 69487); Sun, 03 Mar 2024 16:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 69487) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 16:46:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgozJ-000354-8G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:57 -0500 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:46052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgozH-00034x-R1 for 69487@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:46:56 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A3AFE185448; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 16:46:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1709484385; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vk4bXWWN25OAGyNvv0gU6PRC9QlmKss02I8w0hdzJ8U=; b=BGnhW0KmkkXWIlDsEZ4PpZ1b9xnZecVt7gsECuQLuHahV7+fIAhYKb6fGwRqxEwNnVRY0M 9wz1lphVFTOF8RV/0mcJhx91BYDrhZvrPtg2m9Ti/FJhO6C82jmJ76n1R/h96JxicacrDO spuBnO1SVqqqUxTwE2GYP6c2Dp7FwhoN++Jepl0TlCYR4CdWbenLyUOgnE2qkNBwUnSr9g jBbUINeowISmBgfaF6ieSQ7n5YS11xJdDNwO8n8niqmhQlaW74TQmvB+xYbBfFMuJGsuOD L0lOVq3UGhzP/2yxZQ8BeW/LkseFb9uMxMX+pVpf2uJYIc5JzkmVS4ES2WAGHQ== In-Reply-To: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ttlqvvff.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87edcrmffk.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spamd-Bar: - X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Josselin Poiret From: Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.87 X-Spam-Score: -7.87 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 54E9D5CC4F X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: GC+ovc8ziG3p --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andr=C3=A9 Andr=C3=A9 A. Gomes writes: > Hi Guix, > > Take a package that you have installed in the default profile, say > "which". Then notice that when issuing "guix shell --pure" followed by > "which which" replies that the command can't be found. On the other > hand, when starting the environment via "guix shell", the command can be > found. > > If my memory isn't tricking me, the "pure" flag used to behave > differently. It simply started the shell with a clean env, but it still > exposed the packages from the default profile. Am I missing something > or is this a regression? No, this is `--pure` working as expected, the other behavior you describe would be considered a bug. Maybe you used to have the default profile loaded through .bashrc, even though this is discouraged exactly for that reason? Best, =2D-=20 Josselin Poiret --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmXkqV8QHGRldkBqcG9p cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5Fhcaiv7AC/sGMRVeFbM3JP/ATd51CCibVMDSe09Py83I SktHhCasFPGKqnaC8t98I8KjiCXD99g7GU3whRIbz/mC1gWJEgodTQak/zsI3sKO Z8KoSuffbmcrttBYwA2D2oHJlUdaXUjI6/UcsNVJftV3io/0Gx6KJ17Ma04KSJ1F gBw50Tu9enQP5st4cgAMTyoCvGYzwegVZf9z9QSrreflDSDG9m0EfpMkVKmQ0FMY eO8XGxWj40mValZQIirAcdN98BPIYi4f4W8LMF+qT1H9r8DPqzGXjqQuiX+fGEMF CjAUI+k/oUTxUozqq9GN43WWfFHDIY5r4Z7ozdbzFMPi2oW0c64VqDbuGcrg4jo7 znggX0CaV5gzDdzdNbM6NA42vxvxU31ByjovBMCqO7jmBGXLLuHaOvzmaxqfY3x2 Rn7kiG3+RtlnUjPjNyVqFPm2FIshhihuTi7BZ7v6bXXslK/JP3BdIhVtWLRntxma s0Zkozb2IbXnVVcksbG/bU5Qu9U0JhA= =7+9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--