From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#25142: openssl lacks lib/libssl.a Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:40:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1h1xu4s.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <8737hy85fq.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87lgvpxzpm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87eg1hwg8u.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIby-0005xO-0z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:41:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIbu-0002Ly-5S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:41:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIbt-0002LX-VL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:41:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFIbt-0002Z8-MM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:41:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87eg1hwg8u.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: ng0 Cc: 25142@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ng0 writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> ng0 writes: >> >>> In commit 0c69a17efdba0c7c3da0f25800a3c3233200e47b I found out >>> that our openssl lacks lib/libssl.a ... this should be fixed >>> somehow with the next update of the openssl package. >> >> Did you try the "static" output of OpenSSL? > > No, I did not know it existed. If this would be in out:static, > why is this file in libressl normal output? I think the main reason static libraries are often in separate outputs is because of bandwidth concerns, since they are often much larger than their dynamic counterparts (.so). And the closure size can be smaller, since they don't contain external references. LibreSSL probably haven't seen enough use for it to be a concern. Feel free to submit a patch! :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlhKijMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpoZQgAhwZnmGl4xpWSmJ4gU6P7pi4EKChcfhGEpAoDxiIGCafTFNjK65AMyIlu wAPLucfoTprwQ+cXOlUlMlTD9NjOBMepSth4QSou0BZRscOJITH4bvZjL5F3EM7t W3RlvCi0DTicIa6KeeIRQrq2GV1IpGIENuetI+TCHj+RbywIlqG0AK/tEJcev0g0 TL+uotmRa2hglNo1Vhb7uBfWxBne24H4Zic4IJJVuunG5ZpkaqPHPh2bizXJhVxz q47eNSTFQEovaREb9RSxhOKAWYbGTi6BS7M85MQgz9ADXJvH1NYjHzqkEepHgLAE RBJ+oH2wYQX8/LPCvSs9rjEkh45T9w== =plMC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--