From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#26581: Leftover patch round-up
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 23:19:41 +0200
Message-ID: <87d1c5a26q.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170420182538.GA11903@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50357)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d1fyG-0004dS-Ln
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:20:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d1fyE-0005VK-1v
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:20:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34787)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1d1fyD-0005VG-VF
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:20:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d1fyD-0001SB-R1
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:20:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26581.B26581.14928095925568@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170420182538.GA11903@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu,
	20 Apr 2017 14:25:38 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 26581@debbugs.gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> Let's find the patch files whose filenames are not referenced anywhere,
> except possibly in 'gnu/local.mk':

Woohoo, spring cleanup!  :-)

> Specific notes for each file:
>
> gcc-libiberty-printf-decl.patch: Added in
> b810a85019ab3c4ee1f889d0751b8eb06157dadc and mentioned in the
> commit message but never used, AFAICT. Ludo?

It was used for 5.3 (commit e3d0fcbf7e55e8cbe8d0a1c5a24d73f341d7243b,
which the commit above reinstated; see
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2016-04/msg00039.html>) but useless in
5.4.  So yes, can be removed!

Except for this one:

> gnu/packages/patches/readline-7.0-mingw.patch: Introduced in
> ae12d586275cdd96db23fb01bf840b2055b5b979, but never used. Jan, can you
> take a look?

=E2=80=A6 it looks like you can go ahead and remove=E2=80=99em all!

Maybe we should add a makefile target to check for stale patches?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.