From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22384: Requirements for an ARM port? Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:02:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87d12860sf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160116102726.GA4482@novena-choice-citizen.lan> <877esjf49p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eboJ0-0004tc-9X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:03:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eboIw-00060q-A1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:03:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eboIw-00060k-6j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:03:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eboIv-0001pv-Pp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:03:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <877esjf49p.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:58:10 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: Jookia <166291@gmail.com>, 22384-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > Jookia <166291@gmail.com> writes: > >> I'm considering seeing if I can get GuixSD to work on an ARM board of mi= ne. I'd >> like to know what the main blockers are that I'll need to pass. From wha= t I've >> read and understood, the reason there's no ARM port now is lack of work = and >> reliance on GRUB. Assuming I bootstrap and set up a u-boot package for my >> specific board, what else would I need to do? > > According to [1] Guix 0.14 provides support for ARMv7. So I would > consider this bug fixed. > > [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/blog/2017/porting-guixsd-to-armv7/ Indeed. As the post mentions, GuixSD has not been =E2=80=9Cported to ARM= =E2=80=9D but rather ported to a specific ARM board=E2=80=94but that=E2=80=99s the way it= is. Thanks for going through the bug backlog! Ludo=E2=80=99.