From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timothy Sample Subject: bug#36924: fixing GDM + GNOME Shell Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:59:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87d0hgpdjl.fsf__15177.2834987909$1565233292$gmane$org@ngyro.com> References: <87tvawzlvq.fsf@elephly.net> <87k1bqgtn1.fsf@netris.org> <87sgqexj2k.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvYfn-00031K-VI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:01:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvYfm-0003fj-BH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:01:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvYfm-0003ff-8U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:01:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvYfm-0005z6-4k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:01:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87sgqexj2k.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 06 Aug 2019 20:08:51 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 36924@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> It's interesting that I've never run into this problem, not even once, >> in all my years of running GNOME on Guix systems. Since recently >> reverting to mostly using GNOME under X and GDM (whereas for a while I >> was mostly launching GNOME manually under Wayland), I've run into some >> other problems, e.g. GDM suspending my system automatically, sometimes >> immediately after logging out, but I've *never* had to remove my caches. > > Interesting. FWIW, I=E2=80=99m having the same good luck as Mark. Other than the upgrade from 3.24 to 3.28, I=E2=80=99ve never had this kind of trouble with GNOME a= nd GDM. And even then, IIRC, the issue wasn=E2=80=99t really with the state f= iles (deleting them just happened to serve as a temporary work-around). -- Tim