From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36931: guile-bash repository no longer exists? Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:32:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0gv4zbt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <05b9dc182cdcbe72ddea77191681258380a672a4.camel@gmail.com> <87ftmfznhs.fsf@elephly.net> <20190805223907.5ead2297@alma-ubu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i1CUq-0003jz-Pz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:33:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1CUo-0008R1-Mz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:33:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i1CUo-0008Qe-G8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i1CUo-0007xN-Ai for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:33:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190805223907.5ead2297@alma-ubu> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?="'s message of "Mon, 5 Aug 2019 22:39:07 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 36931@debbugs.gnu.org, Jesse Gibbons Hello, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > Backtrace: > 4 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/ixb9ja1vxd46ydf83qbj9f3f6qz?") > In ./guix/swh.scm: > 532:8 3 (call-with-temporary-directory #) > 552:10 2 (_ "/tmp/guix-build-guile-bash-0.1.6-0.1eabc56-checkout?") > In ./guix/build/utils.scm: > 778:22 1 (_) > In unknown file: > 0 (get-bytevector-n! #f #vu8(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?) ?) > > ERROR: In procedure get-bytevector-n!: > In procedure get-bytevector-n!: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expect= ing open input port): #f Ouch. I=E2=80=99ve improved error reporting handling here, but I think the fundamental issue is that SWH is failing to deliver this thing, even though it does have it: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix swh) scheme@(guile-user)> (lookup-revision "1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd228328= 4469") $18 =3D #< id: "1eabc563ca5692b3e08d84f1f0e6fd2283284469" date: #= directory: "ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf= " directory-url: "/api/1/directory/ad8976564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf= /"> scheme@(guile-user)> (vault-fetch (revision-directory $18) 'directory) $19 =3D #f scheme@(guile-user)> (query-vault (revision-directory $18) 'directory) $20 =3D #< id: 3296879 fetch-url: "/api/1/vault/directory/ad89= 76564375ee55f645387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf/raw/" object-id: "ad8976564375ee55f645= 387bbcdf4b66e6582fbf" object-type: directory progress-message: #nil status:= done> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Let=E2=80=99s see! Ludo=E2=80=99.